|
Home | Forum | Online Store | Information | LJ Webcam | Gallery | Register | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-12-2013, 09:59 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: OC, CA
Posts: 234
|
Raymarine Dragonfly
Last edited by PE.rider; 07-12-2013 at 10:09 PM. |
07-12-2013, 10:09 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,856
|
__________________
www.facebook.com/Teamsewer |
07-12-2013, 11:03 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Pedro
Posts: 144
|
Looks Good. My wife would kill me
Dan |
07-12-2013, 11:35 PM | #4 |
.
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,155
|
looks pretty sweet
__________________
|
07-13-2013, 12:45 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Oceanside
Posts: 1,470
|
Pricetag on that beast?
__________________
|
07-13-2013, 07:29 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: OC, CA
Posts: 234
|
List Price is 649. Downvision to 600 ft, traditional to 1200 ft. Looks promising...
Definitely ON the List to Buy. Start saving those greenbacks! |
07-13-2013, 08:38 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,856
|
That's a great price but I'm always a little pessimistic about having the newest technology.
__________________
www.facebook.com/Teamsewer Last edited by jorluivil; 07-13-2013 at 11:04 AM. |
07-13-2013, 09:41 AM | #8 |
Made in U.S.A.
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Dana Point
Posts: 1,625
|
From the manual - Maximum depth 189 m (600 ft) — Optimum fresh water conditions. Applies to both Sonar and DownVision. From ebay listing: High resolution Down Vision images up to 250 ft. Conventional sonar performance up to 600 ft.
__________________
Hobie PA 14 ¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸><(((º> Jackson Kraken ¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸><(((º> Malibu X-Factor ¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸><(((º> Malibu Stealth-12 ¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸><(((º> Its not a spelling B its a fishing B ~yakjoe |
07-13-2013, 10:30 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Riverside CA
Posts: 673
|
So I finally picked up a HDS 7 and someone posts something better lol
|
07-13-2013, 12:44 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Seal Beach, CA
Posts: 428
|
|
07-13-2013, 01:01 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Riverside CA
Posts: 673
|
|
07-13-2013, 04:05 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SAN DIEGO
Posts: 1,086
|
most fish finders put out 500 watts. the dragonfly FF puts out only 8 watts.
This FF is better suited for fresh shallow lakes. Its a weak Fish finder in my opinion. |
07-13-2013, 04:21 PM | #13 |
Team Keine Zugehörigkeit
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Way out there
Posts: 2,854
|
I believe your looking at the power comsumption, not the output of the FF. Although the 600 feet is in optimum fresh water conditions.I'd wait a while and see the reviews.
__________________
Não alimente os trolls------------Don't feed the trolls---------------インタネット荒らしを無視しろ Last edited by bus kid; 07-13-2013 at 04:31 PM. |
07-13-2013, 04:41 PM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SAN DIEGO
Posts: 1,086
|
Quote:
Power (Wattage) The power of a sonar unit is described in Watts. The term "peak to peak" is used to describe the overall output power of the transmitter. When dealing with fishfinders, the higher the wattage, the more efficient and powerful the overall unit will be. Low wattage will ultimately bring you slow readouts, meaning a delayed reaction for a reading of a spot you have already traveled over. The bare minimum peak-to-peak power would be 800 Watts, although 3000 plus Watts or more is certainly recommended for most anglers. One key point to remember: the shallower the water you fish, the less power you will need. For those that fish deep water (such as the Great Lakes or saltwater) it is best to choose the most powerful unit that your wallet will allow. |
|
07-13-2013, 04:55 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SAN DIEGO
Posts: 1,086
|
I don't see the peak to peak power watts on any of the spects.
That's why the dragonfly FF is suspect. |
07-13-2013, 04:55 PM | #16 | |
Team Keine Zugehörigkeit
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Way out there
Posts: 2,854
|
Quote:
again consumption not output, from the link above "Power consumption at full brightness 8 watts" Raymarine is not listing the output wattage of the FF. look at the FAQ page. http://www.raymarine.com/view/?id=7625
__________________
Não alimente os trolls------------Don't feed the trolls---------------インタネット荒らしを無視しろ |
|
07-13-2013, 04:56 PM | #17 | |
Team Keine Zugehörigkeit
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Way out there
Posts: 2,854
|
Quote:
found the spec for the ducer (cpt 60) http://raymarine.ning.com/forum/topi...5Comment105336
__________________
Não alimente os trolls------------Don't feed the trolls---------------インタネット荒らしを無視しろ Last edited by bus kid; 07-13-2013 at 05:08 PM. |
|
07-13-2013, 05:11 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SAN DIEGO
Posts: 1,086
|
|
07-13-2013, 07:24 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,526
|
Figure this out quick
I only have 30 days to try out this hds5 before sale is final. I imagine this ducer is mandatory to be in water. And how big is the transducer?
|
07-13-2013, 07:33 PM | #20 |
Team Keine Zugehörigkeit
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Way out there
Posts: 2,854
|
Go get try it out and let us know!
__________________
Não alimente os trolls------------Don't feed the trolls---------------インタネット荒らしを無視しろ |
|
|