|
07-09-2011, 02:19 PM | #1 |
I am just me.
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Lake Forest
Posts: 135
|
I have the outback. Small so I can turn in the bay and get into the small spots but I can go out to the kelp to. Roomy for the gear needed out on the water.
|
07-09-2011, 04:36 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Under a bridge
Posts: 2,169
|
Had both. No difference except more room on outback. The whole thing about speed of the revo..........BS.... not much if any difference there.
Possibly, the Rovo a little better slicing through the surf, maybe. |
07-09-2011, 05:59 PM | #3 |
Loves Surface Irons
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: San Diego
Posts: 455
|
Revo gets my vote
|
07-09-2011, 07:18 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: High desert
Posts: 130
|
Great question. I'm looking into a hobie myself right now, and wanted some info on what owners of them thought
|
07-09-2011, 09:18 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Alhambra
Posts: 506
|
|
07-09-2011, 10:03 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 218
|
Like any kayaks, hobie have their good and bad.
Had a Navigator, outback, and revo (plus a bew others). If you dont think the navigator has enough room, you will not be happy with the revo... That boat has even less usable deck space than the Nav. Had outback as well, if going with a Hobie, I would take that instead. I am one of the few that went to a Hobie, then went back to paddling. I started off paddling for a few years, then went peddling for a few years, now back to paddling. I do miss the hands free fishing of Hobies, but do not miss the extra weight, extra gear, extra maintanence of the drive and rudder, tricky launch and landings, storage issues of Hobies. |
07-09-2011, 10:25 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 265
|
|
|
|