Kayak Fishing Adventures on Big Water’s Edge  

Go Back   Kayak Fishing Adventures on Big Water’s Edge > Kayak Fishing Forum - Message Board > Kayak Fishing Reports
Home Forum Online Store Information LJ Webcam Gallery Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-09-2011, 09:12 PM   #1
dorado50
Senior Member
 
dorado50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: La Jolla Shores
Posts: 1,626
If I catch fish Im more than willing to talk to these people when I don't they seem to irratate me!! That's just the way it is.. Great info guys. Hopefully someday I can move past the irratation phase..
dorado50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2011, 09:21 PM   #2
radastaff
Senior Member
 
radastaff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 314
Quote:
Originally Posted by dorado50 View Post
If I catch fish Im more than willing to talk to these people when I don't they seem to irratate me!! That's just the way it is.. Great info guys. Hopefully someday I can move past the irratation phase..
good point too

when i dont catch fish
i get irratated easily
specially when someone comes up to me after the long hard windy day
and askes me if i did
grrr
radastaff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2011, 09:24 PM   #3
dos ballenas
Vampyroteuthis infernalis
 
dos ballenas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 585
Quote:
Originally Posted by dorado50 View Post
If I catch fish Im more than willing to talk to these people when I don't they seem to irratate me!! That's just the way it is.. Great info guys. Hopefully someday I can move past the irratation phase..
agreed! I hate talking to anyone when I smell skunky!
__________________
____________________________________________

dos ballenas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2011, 01:59 PM   #4
GregAndrew
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,384
While I don't believe in general that the clip board crew have an agenda, the data they gather is not scientific and will create statistics that will be used inacurately against us. Surveying is much less effective in creating useful statistics when there is a low responce rate. From what I have seen at the launches, that is the case.

If the catch rates are relatively high, then we are going to be blamed for overfishing. If they are low then there are no more fish in the ocean. If 80% of anglers catch their target fish, then the other 20% will be the point of the other sides argument. In a protectionist political environment, it is better for us to provide less ammo for the other side. So the question is " Does my response provide more or less ammo to those who would close fishing?".

I don't know what the best thing for us to do is, but I am pretty sure that information obtained from these surveys will not help us catch fish. Nor will it accurately determine fish populations. I am inclined to cooperate when I catch fish and decline when I don't.
GregAndrew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2011, 02:16 PM   #5
Regor
Greg
 
Regor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chula Vista, ca
Posts: 509
I've never seen "them", but I'm reading through this thread and hear assumptions going both ways, for them, against them.

Every reputable organization usually has "the" pitch that they are told to use....

..
..

Hi, I'm Susie from Scripts Institute, and I'm here to do a survey ... blah blah blah.

Hi, I'm Joe, your local DFG officer. Here to check your catch and license.

So far I've heard no-one state who these folks really are, or who they say they are? Guess if I ever see the "clipboard lady" I'll have to pick her brain as much as she tries to pick mine
Regor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2011, 02:58 PM   #6
tagyak
Senior Member
 
tagyak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Alhambra
Posts: 506
not to change the subject; Regor i just noticed your avatar. all this time i thought it was just two clown fish, i didn't notice that they were painted onto two peoples cheeks.
that is really cool......
tagyak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2011, 08:26 PM   #7
radastaff
Senior Member
 
radastaff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 314
Quote:
Originally Posted by tagyak View Post
not to change the subject; Regor i just noticed your avatar. all this time i thought it was just two clown fish, i didn't notice that they were painted onto two peoples cheeks.
that is really cool......

that is way cool
iam trippin on it

imagine u and ure gf/wife having those tatts
that would be crazy
radastaff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2011, 07:54 AM   #8
MuddyMike
Senior Member
 
MuddyMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 111
Quote:
Originally Posted by Regor View Post
So far I've heard no-one state who these folks really are, or who they say they are? Guess if I ever see the "clipboard lady" I'll have to pick her brain as much as she tries to pick mine
I met a clipboard lady coming in at Dana Landing. I asked "Who is this for?" She said DFG. She had a DFG hat and shirt on, not a uniform, just a hat with the emblem, and white shirt with the emblem. She was not driving a DFG marked car either.
MuddyMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2011, 12:28 PM   #9
Margarita Mike
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 76
At this point, I really don't trust any of them. Who can you believe anymore?
Sorry.
Margarita Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2011, 04:14 PM   #10
dos ballenas
Vampyroteuthis infernalis
 
dos ballenas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 585
Quote:
Originally Posted by MuddyMike View Post
I met a clipboard lady coming in at Dana Landing. I asked "Who is this for?" She said DFG. She had a DFG hat and shirt on, not a uniform, just a hat with the emblem, and white shirt with the emblem. She was not driving a DFG marked car either.
DFG wardens wear uniforms.

DFG biologists DO NOT wear uniforms, or drive state vehicles.

You guys are classic. The sky is falling the sky is falling!

Do you guys believe in medical science?

There are many people that are passionate about the ocean. Most of them do not have hidden agendas.

Yes there are flaws in the way the data is collected. Yes there are probably better ways to get better data.

We still have a lot to learn about the ocean and all its resources.

I can't figure it out: The same guys that don't trust fisheries biologists are the same guys that get excited about stuff like the satellite tagging of albacore tuna and tracking them across the ocean from Japan to the U.S. West coast.

Without fisheries research and management many of our Ca fisheries would have collapsed a long time ago.

Can you imagine what it would be like if no one ever took the time to figure out how long it takes for a Calico to reach sexual maturity? What about banning inshore drift gill nets?

A wise man once said: Its not about closures, its about proper management.
__________________
____________________________________________

dos ballenas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2011, 04:54 PM   #11
MuddyMike
Senior Member
 
MuddyMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 111
Quote:
Originally Posted by dos ballenas View Post
DFG wardens wear uniforms.

DFG biologists DO NOT wear uniforms, or drive state vehicles.

You guys are classic. The sky is falling the sky is falling!

Do you guys believe in medical science?
Chill out man. What part of my post mentioned I doubted her.

I was responding to the other post about people asking who they were. I had no reason to doubt she was taking data for DFG.
MuddyMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 2002 Big Water's Edge. All rights reserved.