Kayak Fishing Adventures on Big Water’s Edge  

Go Back   Kayak Fishing Adventures on Big Water’s Edge > Kayak Fishing Forum - Message Board > General Kayak Fishing Discussion
Home Forum Online Store Information LJ Webcam Gallery Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-19-2009, 10:17 PM   #1
dgax65
Guerro Grande
 
dgax65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 629
I'll be there for both the day and evening sessions.
__________________
Douglas Gaxiola
Team No Fish- Amateur Staff
dgax65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 06:10 PM   #2
tylerdurden
Bad Clone
 
tylerdurden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 874
Bump.

This post should never be off the front page.

We need other guys to make the commitment, not the same couple that have shown up every time.

No excuses. We have over 2 weeks notice to request time off work. This meeting is more important than all the others combined. It always was. The others were very important, but if we don't follow through it could all be for nothing.
__________________
MLPA, if you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem

Let the Fish and Game Commission know what you think about the proposed maps.

Be ready for December 9th and 10th.




tylerdurden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 06:43 PM   #3
dmrides
Senior Member
 
dmrides's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Point Loma
Posts: 584
I am for sure headed to this meeting. I participated in the "Save Trestles" Campaign and saw first hand that our policy makers sometimes do actually listen to the passionate voices that use, enjoy and take care of the places that we cherish. Do not miss this opportunity to make your voices heard, even if you are just there in the audience to show your support. The sheer numbers of supporters alone go along way and will not go unnoticed. We have to rally together for this one.
dmrides is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 07:04 PM   #4
Tman
BRTF...bought & paid...
 
Tman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,247
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmrides View Post
I am for sure headed to this meeting. I participated in the "Save Trestles" Campaign and saw first hand that our policy makers sometimes do actually listen to the passionate voices that use, enjoy and take care of the places that we cherish. Do not miss this opportunity to make your voices heard, even if you are just there in the audience to show your support. The sheer numbers of supporters alone go along way and will not go unnoticed. We have to rally together for this one.
And this needs to be noticed. Touch on this statement, thank you dmrides...

"Do not miss this opportunity to make your voices heard, even if you are just there in the audience to show your support. The sheer numbers of supporters alone go along way and will not go unnoticed."

Profound statement indeed...
__________________
Adios

Tman
Gaffer for Clay the Fishcatcher
Tman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 08:20 PM   #5
bellcon
Senior Member
 
bellcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Pedro
Posts: 999
Quote:
"Do not miss this opportunity to make your voices heard, even if you are just there in the audience to show your support. The sheer numbers of supporters alone go along way and will not go unnoticed."
I also think thats worth repeating
bellcon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2009, 08:42 AM   #6
PAL
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 754
Quote:
for us, WG2 is the best we can hope for, but I don't konw how it affects you guys. seems we're getting played against each other. and that's their plan.
Workgroup 2 is by far the best plan for La Jolla and greater San Diego. It's balanced - the conservation value is excellent, every science guideline is met, and economic impacts are reduced.

Everything stays virtually unchanged at LJ. The most resiliant kelp bed in the county at north Pt Loma is the one that is closed, and rightly so. Rare deep water rock is captured by the proposed Del Mar SMR.

The workgroup 2 proposal was assembled by fishing, defense and govt institutional reps with the specific goal of reducing economic impacts. There was no playing one group off another in WG2, just an intent to balance the pain.

That said, in the WG2 proposal Palos Verdes area kayak anglers would lose access to the Terranea Resort launch at southwest PV, an area that was only opened a couple of months back. They may ask the BRTF for an adjustment to WG2 or support another plan in that specific area. When testifying at the upcoming meeting, you may want to limit your comments to your own backyards, such as "In San Diego and Malibu I support the WG2 plan."

Please don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions about workgroup 2's proposal. Looking at the big picture, by far it sucks the least. WG1 and 3 call for massive closures that exceed science guidelines in Orange County, Malibu, and other places around the coast. WG1 does the most damage to San Diego - I recommend BWE oppose it vigorously for the southern portion of the SoCal study region.
PAL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2009, 12:30 PM   #7
dmrides
Senior Member
 
dmrides's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Point Loma
Posts: 584
I am also a member of Surfrider and today received an email from them about a meeting on September 30th to give your input about the MLPA's. Is anyone headed to that meeting?

MLPA Community Forum Information: September 30, Wednesday from 7-8pm at the Encinitas Community/Senior Center located at 1140 Oakcrest Park Drive
 in Encinitas. Forum is located in Room 142B.
dmrides is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 2002 Big Water's Edge. All rights reserved.