![]() |
|
Home | Forum | Online Store | Information | LJ Webcam | Gallery | Register | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
BRTF...bought & paid...
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,247
|
"The three items that the MLPAs are supposed to address are coastal development, pollution & over-fishing. They have so far failed to even address the two biggest factors, instead going after the easier to attack industry of fishing..."
From an Andrew Wright comment, LA Times article. So, go after the over-fishing, yet downsize the DFG? And when you close these productive areas for fishing, who's going to monitor and enforce the regulations? Who said the MLPA process was logical?
__________________
Adios Tman Gaffer for Clay the Fishcatcher ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 446
|
You should also say that they have even gone so far as to suggest what we should wear to their meetings!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|