Great news regarding fishing license.

[goldenglory18]

About damn time!

[ctfphoto]

Dosen't really matter as most of us fish year round.

Big fish are caught in January.

[lowprofile]

Originally Posted by ctfphoto

Dosen't really matter as most of us fish year round.

Big fish are caught in January.

It matters for those of us in and out of the state or country often and don't get to buy a license the first 1-6 months of the year. It's nice to know I can buy a license in December and not have to buy one again in February or March.

[alanw]

I'm sure people are less likely to buy a license later in the year, so this is good news.

But, 76% more expensive than other states and still facing a deficit? Another option would be to decrease the cost of a damn license in the first place, then more people would buy one and they can get the extra federal funding... Or downsize the state conservation and fishery programs since they aren't needed if there are less people fishing.

[GTboosted]

Sweet, when does it go into effect?

[rossman]

Originally Posted by lowprofile

It matters for those of us in and out of the state or country often and don't get to buy a license the first 1-6 months of the year. It's nice to know I can buy a license in December and not have to buy one again in February or March.

That is a good point but unfortunately the net result in your scenario wold be a loss in revenue to the state which may not be palatable. If this bill gets passed and signed by Governor Moon beam it is a small victory for California sportsmen. I think it a total misconception that the current licensing plans is a major contributor to the decline in recreational fishing in California. And to expect that there will be success similar to Texas is a total fantasy. Texas is a state of sportsmen first of all and secondly, as a resident I can buy an all water resident license for $40. Actually 22 bucks because I'm a senior. The current licensing scheme in California is one of the trivial many problems, not the significant few.

[jorluivil]

I could care less about this.

However, if anything will come out of this its the fact that we are likely to have more people out fishing with an expired license. Why? Well, its is much easier to remember that your license expires 12/31 and not 5/17 or 8/13 or 9/43 or 10/31 or 13/12, right? While I agree that this is a win for those who may be overseas and do not buy their license at the beginning of the year its an even bigger win for the CDFW.

[socal.beach.bum]

Just buy a lifetime license like me, expires the day I die 😇

[Mr. NiceGuy]

Yay.

The calendar based system is annoying for those who buy their licenses later in the year, effectively jacking up their price per day for fishing.

Regardless of the alleged and proven benefits supply side economics, I can't help wondering if the state will now jack up fees to make up for their "shortfall" of revenue by no longer being able to sell half-year licenses for full year prices?

Their ravenous thirst for ever-increasing budgets never wanes.

Originally Posted by Mahigeer

-- but we still have a ways to go. Before reaching the Governor’s desk, SB 187 must pass the State Assembly. Your continued support is greatly appreciated.

Uh-oh. Good luck. I'll bet a margarita and a dollar that the only thing that passes is a bill that sucks more tax money, expands the bureaucracy, buys votes and makes things more complicated for the rest of us peasants who get exploited.

Cynical you say? Moi? That's probably a fair bet too.

A visionary classic about Jerry Brown from the old days:
https://youtu.be/jN-_UOvwNA8