![]() |
|
Home | Forum | Online Store | Information | LJ Webcam | Gallery | Register | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Emperor
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Buena Park
Posts: 3,649
|
Quote:
Why is the low frequency not needed...? I use it all the time...It works great.
__________________
There's nothing colder than yesterday's hotdog. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Bonita
Posts: 29
|
It will work and you will work fine in low and youll get a great pitchure but but you may be sacrificing detail, target seperation and coverage area. High is designed for shallow, less than 50', medium up to 1000' and low up to 3000'. by using it. Medium frequency is stated to have a wider coverage area. Technology is so advanced you really cant go wrong with even the most basic units for locating bait, fish, etc. i remember using the lowarnce x-15 that burned on paper with the stylus and those cost 500$ in the eighties. Now we have 100$ color units that blow it away.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Calexico
Posts: 134
|
Thanks Darrell
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Brandon
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,345
|
Quote:
Yep, I use low frequency often also. But usually have the higher frequency on the other side of the screen. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Emperor
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Buena Park
Posts: 3,649
|
Quote:
You might get a good picture with more detail on 200...but like you just said a lower frequencey like 50 will have a wider coverage area. So why is a wider coverage area not needed or necessary when you are searching for fish?
__________________
There's nothing colder than yesterday's hotdog. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Junior
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Bonita
Posts: 29
|
The lower the frequency, the lower the width of coverage. There is a trade off with everything and each has it uses. But as with anything, if it works for you i wouldnt change it. This is an Excerpt from Lowrance reg. Chirp
How Multiple CHIRP sonar settings provide clarity Multiple CHIRP ranges from a single transducer: Because Lowrance fishfinders give you the option of using more than one CHIRP Sonar signal, it’s important to understand which one is right for your fishing situation. High CHIRP frequency selection: Most frequently used for freshwater as well as more shallow coastal areas. It provides the greatest detail for tracking smaller objects, like your lure, or identifying game fish from bait fish, as well as game fish that are near structure or on the bottom. Medium CHIRP frequency selection: Wide coverage makes this frequency best for covering large areas while searching for structure or fish. However, this option is not as detailed as High CHIRP and will not penetrate as deep as Low CHIRP. Low CHIRP frequency selection: Provides the greatest depth performance, while marking fish targets throughout the entire water column. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Emperor
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Buena Park
Posts: 3,649
|
Quote:
I believe you got that wrong my friend... The lower the frequency the wider the coverage area with of course better depth penetration and like you said less clarity/resolution/target separation....but really it's good enough. ![]() I think you better reconsider telling everyone that the low frequency is not needed or necessary...if you ever tried using it, you probably wouldn't say it's unnecessary.... Try it out, I think you'll like it.
__________________
There's nothing colder than yesterday's hotdog. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Calexico
Posts: 134
|
Can you split the screen with both frequencies?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Emperor
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Buena Park
Posts: 3,649
|
Sure you can.
__________________
There's nothing colder than yesterday's hotdog. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Brandon
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,345
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|