What's your Favorite Fish Finder? - Kayak Fishing Adventures on Big Water’s Edge

TJones · 06-17-2015, 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AirborneYak

The helix 5 comes with their unimap and that does not have any topography. But the helix 5 has a better screen resolution than any other on your list.

I previously had a hummingbird 898 si , this unit was incredible , but probably not suited for a kayak . The transducer was huge , and mounting was an issue . It looks like the have come up with a downsized version , but I am curious on how you are mounting it ?

AirborneYak · 06-17-2015, 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TJones

I previously had a hummingbird 898 si , this unit was incredible , but probably not suited for a kayak . The transducer was huge , and mounting was an issue . It looks like the have come up with a downsized version , but I am curious on how you are mounting it ?

The transducer(XNT 9 SI 180 T) for the helix 5 si fit perfectly in the lowrance ready 2014 revo 13 hull. All I need was the humminbird adapter kit. I'll take some picture and post it up. I haven't been able to take it on the water yet, so I'm not sure how well the H5si will do on the water both fresh and salt. I figure, I'll be fishing in less than 60ish feet of water and the side imaging would be pretty cool to have.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

FISH11 · 06-17-2015, 05:01 PM

What I like about the HDS5 is all the controlls to be able to personalize the screen for (pallette) multiple color preferences on the display makes it easier to read and the way you can adjust the split screen for width of a prticular side when using split screen. The way the unit changes depth range automatically. All the manual adjustments for sensitivity, again makes it much easier to read or eliminate clutter. The navionix chart included in the unit. I am sure I don't remember all the features I like on it right now. The Raymarine has none of the variables on screen colors. The auto mode SUCKS as mentioned in other threads the unit thinks kelp under your kayak is the bottom of the ocean and by the time you set it to manual and reduce the sensitivity you don't get that much detail. Good thing I didn't buy that unit and it came with the HOW Cuda 14 my grandson won in 2014 with the raffle ticket I had bought. If I had bought it I would have returned it. Even the Elite 4 on my other kayak works better. I have Gear track mounted on all my kayaks and have used the Raymarine at the same time as the other units side by side so I could compare the readings. All it did was make me appreciate how the other units showed the same things under my kayak. I did learn how to interpret better what the screen was showing on the other units when comparing the info to the split screen on the Raymarine showing the sonar on one and the chirp on the other. The range displayed on the screen is also too much depth for the size of the screen. I don't know if that helps but I found it to be better on fresh water lakes but I just don't fish there hardly at all.

06-17-2015, 05:01 PM	#3
FISH11 Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Location: Pine Valley when not fishing La Jolla Posts: 2,643	What I like about the HDS5 is all the controlls to be able to personalize the screen for (pallette) multiple color preferences on the display makes it easier to read and the way you can adjust the split screen for width of a prticular side when using split screen. The way the unit changes depth range automatically. All the manual adjustments for sensitivity, again makes it much easier to read or eliminate clutter. The navionix chart included in the unit. I am sure I don't remember all the features I like on it right now. The Raymarine has none of the variables on screen colors. The auto mode SUCKS as mentioned in other threads the unit thinks kelp under your kayak is the bottom of the ocean and by the time you set it to manual and reduce the sensitivity you don't get that much detail. Good thing I didn't buy that unit and it came with the HOW Cuda 14 my grandson won in 2014 with the raffle ticket I had bought. If I had bought it I would have returned it. Even the Elite 4 on my other kayak works better. I have Gear track mounted on all my kayaks and have used the Raymarine at the same time as the other units side by side so I could compare the readings. All it did was make me appreciate how the other units showed the same things under my kayak. I did learn how to interpret better what the screen was showing on the other units when comparing the info to the split screen on the Raymarine showing the sonar on one and the chirp on the other. The range displayed on the screen is also too much depth for the size of the screen. I don't know if that helps but I found it to be better on fresh water lakes but I just don't fish there hardly at all. __________________ MARK ......... 2016 MALIBU X FACTOR, 2020 SOLO SKIFF (Fishing Kayak on Steroids )