![]() |
|
Home | Forum | Online Store | Information | LJ Webcam | Gallery | Register | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Currently @ MLO Territory
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Under the Shadow
Posts: 2,290
|
That is HILARIOUS!!!!!!!!
![]()
__________________
![]() Team: Disbanded You only have one chance in this life...make the right decision(s)...so you don't regret it
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: East County
Posts: 914
|
The answer is NO. When I first got my T-13, I went to the CHP office in El Cajon. The officer seemed to have all the answers immediately with no pauses to have to think. He said that if you take the length of your vehicle excluding the bumpers, divide by two. That is how far out you can extend with or without a hitch extender. The extender is merely for support. i.e. if your vehicle is 16 ft front to back, excluding bumpers. Your kayak can extend 8 feet from back of truck. If your tailgate is down, that doesn't count toward how far you can extend.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Currently @ MLO Territory
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Under the Shadow
Posts: 2,290
|
I wish CVC could provide a legal definition of " the last point of support", because it seems to leave the interpretation of this part of the law to CHP. (well many of the laws) This is probably the reason why, very few if any have gotten a ticket for this.
the Webster dictionary defines "Support" it as: v. t. 1. To bear by being under; to keep from falling; to uphold; to sustain, in a literal or physical sense; to prop up; to bear the weight of; as, a pillar supports a structure; an abutment supports an arch; the trunk of a tree supports the branches. I would like to see how a court judge would rule on this matter, since you can argue that a truckbed extender is the last point of support for the kayak. just a thought if anyone receives a citation for this. But if you do get pulled over, I would not argue over it. Just go to court and see what happens.
__________________
![]() Team: Disbanded You only have one chance in this life...make the right decision(s)...so you don't regret it
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Currently @ MLO Territory
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Under the Shadow
Posts: 2,290
|
![]() Quote:
LOAD-CARRYING EXTENSIONS 35402. (a) Any extension or device used to increase the carrying capacity of a vehicle shall be included in measuring the length of a vehicle. ...
__________________
![]() Team: Disbanded You only have one chance in this life...make the right decision(s)...so you don't regret it
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Large Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: La Verne, CA
Posts: 1,011
|
Is this what we expect to see behind your truck/suv?
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: East County
Posts: 914
|
Asked my son (lawyer with the DA's office) Said you would lose in court. It is a support and not load bearing. Also said if you think about it, your truck is 16 ft. long, extension is 4 ft. you would be able to extend 10 ft beyond the extension. Won't fly in court. Take it for what it is worth. If you win in court, great, if not. Have a fine to pay.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Currently @ MLO Territory
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Under the Shadow
Posts: 2,290
|
Quote:
EXTENSIONS TO THE REAR: Per CVC Section 35410, the load upon a vehicle, trailer or semitrailer shall not extend to the rear beyond the last point of supportfor a greater distance than that equal to two-thirds of the length of the wheelbase. The wheelbase of a semitrailer shall be considered as the distance between the rearmost axle of the towing vehicle and the rearmost axle of the semitrailer. ![]() __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ ____ True it is not load bearing, it is for support. So if they say that it is a support;then technically it is the last point of support, and you should be able to extend two-thirds of the length of the wheelbase not exceeding the 40 ft rule. 35400. (a) A vehicle may not exceed a length of 40 feet. I am just reading the law with my own interpretation so take them with a grain of salt.
__________________
![]() Team: Disbanded You only have one chance in this life...make the right decision(s)...so you don't regret it
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 552
|
Your thinking about tris all Rontgen. The regulation is talking about the vehicle, and it's wheel base. It then states that nothing can extend past the end of the truco, beyond 2/3 of the wheel base. The end of the truck being the end of the bed. The issue with extending cargo beyond the vehicle is that when making a turn from one street to another, or on sharp turns, and left turns, your vehicle, including cargo can occupy more than one lane. In the past, I have hauled irrigation pipe on a trailer, it often hung off the trailer by 15 or more feet. As such, when I made a left turn the pipe would be blocking the number 1 and 2 lanes of traffic ( heading in the direction I was going if I had not turned). As such, if I did not wait to make my turn, until all through traffic had cleared, I could have had a car run right into my load. So in short, such a load may be legal, but it can be very dangerous. So, if your load is sticking out, way past the end of the bed, be careful.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Westside
Posts: 141
|
after a few minutes on the phone with chp codes 35410 and 24604 apply. the support doesn't add "length" not already permissable by law. 2/3 wheelbase is max, if 4ft or more, red flag 12"x12" square for daytime and lamps for night. the bed extender or like device doesn't give you the length the longer wheel base does.
i was specific about kayak transport, and there is also code for front hangover length and view obstruction rules. i could go roof, but i'm not very tall the truck is. he said as long as it's not obnoxious and not in violation of any other codes, you should be ok. i've always loved those words from an officer; 'you should be ok'. hope this helps. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|