![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Baja fish camp
Posts: 478
|
I was once told by a ranger in the sierra's that there was this lake where you could catch 14-15 inch trout all day. He gave us the directions to find it and off we went. It was epic, one fish after another all about 14-15 inches. The problem as I saw it was the fact none weighted even a pound. The lake had been stocked several years before because of confused identity, the fish had enough food to exist, but not enough to thrive. I've seen barracuda fatter than those trout.
I'm not trying to suggest changing how we determine big fish, but maybe we consider including length because it can give us a feel for lesser know types of big fish. This is just a discussion, how do others feel?
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Made in U.S.A.
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Dana Point
Posts: 1,625
|
My opinion is that length is used by biology and science related stuff. Weight is for fishermen. Weight and length together determine how healthy a fish is. World records are by weight, fish is sold by weight, so fishermen use weight. I personally like weight and also having length info as well.
__________________
Hobie PA 14 ¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸><(((º> Jackson Kraken ¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸><(((º> Malibu X-Factor ¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸><(((º> Malibu Stealth-12 ¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸><(((º> Its not a spelling B its a fishing B ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Under a bridge
Posts: 2,169
|
I dont care which way.
To demonstrate the lack of relationship between pounds and inches: I caught two 38.5 inch halis. One weighed 18.5 and the other 27 pounds. That is 50% more weight. Tight lines. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 288
|
Big Fish
Two weekends ago I was at Tidelands and I caught a 16 1/2 inch lizard fish. My personal best for that type. C + R
__________________
God, Family, Your Health, You're Fishing. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Large Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: La Verne, CA
Posts: 1,011
|
As determined by the IGFA, the correct way to measure is:
(Length x Diameter) + (Weight/Girth) all divided by the angle of the tip squared. It is species and angler normalized and independent. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,856
|
I don't know about yours but mine is small and fat
![]() OOh wait, we're talking about fish ![]()
__________________
![]() www.facebook.com/Teamsewer |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Jason
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: CA
Posts: 67
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Malibu |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Menifee
Posts: 2,509
|
Quote:
I look at it this way as well. For me, I know a pig when I see it ![]()
__________________
”The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it.” ~Thomas Jefferson.........maybe ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|