Kayak Fishing Adventures on Big Water’s Edge  

Go Back   Kayak Fishing Adventures on Big Water’s Edge > Kayak Fishing Forum - Message Board > General Kayak Fishing Discussion
Home Forum Online Store Information LJ Webcam Gallery Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-22-2007, 09:00 AM   #1
aguachico
Senior Member
 
aguachico's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 719
Quote:
Originally Posted by PAL View Post
What are you fishing with, Penn Internationals?
I've stashed up to 4 rigs in there at once. Have you tried putting in them
backwards (toward the stern)?
Seeker grapihte rod. 7'6". 20-40# class sticks (no reels attached). The opening is too shallow for these rods requiring you to insert them guide first. It's easier to put the rods in the front hatch. My point being that the front hatch is a better ROD POD than the ROD POD. Always has been, always will be.

AC

Last edited by aguachico; 08-22-2007 at 09:34 AM.
aguachico is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 09:36 AM   #2
PAL
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 754
Quote:
Seeker grapihte rod. 7'6". 20-40# class sticks (no reels attached). The opening is too shallow for these rods requiring you to insert them guide first.
Ah, got it - your rods don't fit in butt first. That would have been nice. I'm not bothered by putting them in tip first, right from the cockpit.
PAL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 03:42 PM   #3
Mr Mugu
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Malibu
Posts: 48
How is the front hatch easier when you can go tips first reels attached through the rod pod? I think that was how it was intended from the first place.

As for the sonar shield, I never stow my sonar during surf launches(and I think we have a little more surf to deal with up here) and see no issues with the shield...it gets alot less splash than just leaving it up on deck.
With the shield I kept my sonar attached and powered for 2 weeks straight and 6 outtings, having just pulled it off last weekend.

Not using either of the 2 would negate the need to even have a Trident...no?
Mr Mugu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 07:33 PM   #4
aguachico
Senior Member
 
aguachico's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 719
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Mugu View Post
How is the front hatch easier when you can go tips first reels attached through the rod pod? I think that was how it was intended from the first place.

As for the sonar shield, I never stow my sonar during surf launches(and I think we have a little more surf to deal with up here) and see no issues with the shield...it gets alot less splash than just leaving it up on deck.
With the shield I kept my sonar attached and powered for 2 weeks straight and 6 outtings, having just pulled it off last weekend.

Not using either of the 2 would negate the need to even have a Trident...no?
I'm glad it works for ya and the big surf you have up there. Don't worry yourself about it if the ROD POD brings you such joy. My point is that I've sat in enough yaks to know how to rig them without any special design, salad bowl or rod pod.

Who said I dont use the rod pod or salad bowl? I use both very well and my yak is fucking tight. Lean mean fish killing machine, I'm just smart enough not to mount a humminbird below the deck.

See if it was such a great place to mount it, it wouldn't need a shield would it? Since the shield only blocks water coming from the bow, what do you do when it comes from port, aft or starboard? use your feet? lol
aguachico is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 08:12 PM   #5
aguachico
Senior Member
 
aguachico's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 719
Don;

I just got my 727. I'm waiting for the transducer. Without needless hole drilling it doesn't look like it will fit. The GREATEST THING SINCE SLICE BREAD SONAR SHIElD ------- will not close.

Mr Mugu;

Bite me! so much for "humminbird compatible"
aguachico is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2007, 09:56 PM   #6
bellcon
Senior Member
 
bellcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Pedro
Posts: 999
AC,
It looks like i am gonna give the 717 a try.
couldnt find a 727
still wondering about the matrix 12 and or the 141c
are you gonna hook up a gps antenna to your 727?
i see humminbird makes one for $99.99
or would you just hook up a hand held ?
or both?
Don
bellcon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2007, 05:39 AM   #7
aguachico
Senior Member
 
aguachico's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 719
The 717 is a good unit, the only difference between it and the 727 is resolution. I use a Garmin 76 gps, which is also on a ram mount. Using the ram mounts has saved a lot of desk space. The smaller ones are lighter then the originals. I could use a front mounted rod holder, but I'm trying to keep the yak lean.

My xducer should arrive today. I plan to run it in the scrupper hole, but not permanently. I don't want to block 50% of my drainage and it would also mean that the FF base unit would be permanently mounted to the yak. That one of the things Hbird should change - I like the garmin approach. Connecting the cable (one cable) to the back of the head unit.

I'll post some pics soon.
aguachico is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 2002 Big Water's Edge. All rights reserved.