|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forum | Online Store | Information | LJ Webcam | Gallery | Register | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
05-09-2013, 03:13 PM
|
#1 |
|
CEO of Team Roby
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 905
|
All the numbers and calculations before going out and fishing are important - just as you have explained in your post.
However, the numbers and calculations after you come home with a WSB in your PA may be more important me-thinks..... Congrats... 
|
|
|
|
05-09-2013, 09:17 PM
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Vista
Posts: 411
|
Cool
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
05-10-2013, 09:09 AM
|
#3 |
|
Junior
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 8
|
Uhhh? I was told there wasn't going to be any math on this test. Nice feeeeeesh!
|
|
|
|
|
05-10-2013, 10:27 AM
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Seal Beach, CA
Posts: 428
|
wow..
 imagine how big a  you could have caught under "ideal conditions"? lol..
|
|
|
|
|
05-11-2013, 06:46 AM
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: San Diego
Posts: 129
|
 very cool report from Professor of Fishiology 101, I'm taking notes... heheh  Question - so how do we also adjust our computation to accommodate gravitational coefficient variants of both the Sun and the Moon when it's wee-morning? I'm sure it has a correlative impact to the amplitudinal coefficient of the max tide!?!?
|
|
|
|
|
05-11-2013, 08:29 AM
|
#6 |
|
Jr. Junior
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 31
|
Nice feesh! No wonder I never catch anything, I didn't understand a single word you wrote.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
