Ares Armor - Kayak Fishing Adventures on Big Water’s Edge

StinkyMatt · 01-24-2014, 07:24 PM

The city is enforcing its building/ zoning codes.

They have every right to do what they are doing.

I do not see anything wrong with the city's action.

GregAndrew · 01-25-2014, 12:42 AM

Idk, I am no lawyer, but it seems to me that they may have a case. The sign has been there for 90 years with multiple owners that were not required to tear it down. That sounds like selective enforcement to me. Hell, the sign may pre-exist the law and be grandfathered in somehow. Also, there is no mention in the citation on how to make the sign conforming, which it states can rectify the situation? And 3 days to appeal a sign that has been there for 90 years, really?

blitzburgh · 03-13-2014, 05:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GregAndrew

Idk, I am no lawyer, but it seems to me that they may have a case. The sign has been there for 90 years with multiple owners that were not required to tear it down. That sounds like selective enforcement to me. Hell, the sign may pre-exist the law and be grandfathered in somehow. Also, there is no mention in the citation on how to make the sign conforming, which it states can rectify the situation? And 3 days to appeal a sign that has been there for 90 years, really?

^^^^This

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

01-24-2014, 07:24 PM	#1
StinkyMatt Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Under a bridge Posts: 2,169	The city is enforcing its building/ zoning codes. They have every right to do what they are doing. I do not see anything wrong with the city's action.

01-25-2014, 12:42 AM	#2
GregAndrew Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 2,384	Idk, I am no lawyer, but it seems to me that they may have a case. The sign has been there for 90 years with multiple owners that were not required to tear it down. That sounds like selective enforcement to me. Hell, the sign may pre-exist the law and be grandfathered in somehow. Also, there is no mention in the citation on how to make the sign conforming, which it states can rectify the situation? And 3 days to appeal a sign that has been there for 90 years, really?