|
Home | Forum | Online Store | Information | LJ Webcam | Gallery | Register | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-17-2019, 06:47 PM | #41 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,384
|
|
01-17-2019, 09:30 PM | #42 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Carlsbad
Posts: 388
|
Here's a couple for you guys. Lowrance elite 7 chirp. All surface, noise clarity etc... turned off. Sensitivity 63% colorline 78% ... I found it marks pretty good and i can decipher what type of fish is under the boat but I'm thinking of switching to medium chirp or 200hz vs. 83hz so I have a better understanding of what is directly under me. Thoughts?
IMG_3009.jpg IMG_3380.jpg IMG_3881.jpg
__________________
|
01-18-2019, 07:04 AM | #43 | |
Brandon
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,345
|
Quote:
Judging by the pictures in your graph I wouldn’t change many settings. Those are some great images |
|
01-18-2019, 06:06 PM | #44 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,384
|
Quote:
The high frequency is better at indicating what you are looking at (based on the colors), assuming that both your sensitivity and colorline are not too high nor too low. If all of the targets (including bait schools) return the hardest color of your chosen pallet, then you are probably too high in one or both (in either frequency type). But, in my experience, the high frequency can be better fine tuned to return color differences between species. As with all other marks, the size of (and distance to) the target are going to play a part in what you see on the screen for any particular settings. |
|
01-24-2019, 03:41 PM | #45 |
Junior
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 9
|
Wow I dont know what settings your has that keep the image so clean because my regular 83 khz is so clustered everytime I find heavy structure, bait or fish.. This post is great and super helpful on honing in the fishfinder! Thanx for any help on this!
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk |
01-25-2019, 12:25 PM | #46 |
Brandon
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,345
|
Name that Return
Turn your sensitivity down and I would turn off the 800hz down scan. Looks like your traditional sonar image is in high chirp not 83hz
|
01-25-2019, 03:50 PM | #47 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,384
|
Looks like the high chirp is getting some interference. Might try cycling off any other electronics on board, and checking your transducer cable and pins. The crack in the screen could be troublesome too? If your transducer is not directly in the water, you might want to check for bubbles (although the downscan does not appear bad). Make sure you have the right transducer selected in the setting also. Is the "4X" on your unit scroll speed? If so, I would turn that down to normal.
|
01-25-2019, 06:57 PM | #48 | |
Brandon
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,345
|
Quote:
The 4x appears to be the amount of zoom. Agree with the rest. |
|
01-26-2019, 06:46 AM | #49 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,384
|
|
01-28-2019, 02:36 PM | #50 | |
Junior
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 9
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk |
|
|
|