Kayak Fishing Adventures on Big Water’s Edge  

Go Back   Kayak Fishing Adventures on Big Water’s Edge > Kayak Fishing Forum - Message Board > General Kayak Fishing Discussion
Home Forum Online Store Information LJ Webcam Gallery Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-07-2009, 06:19 PM   #1
FISHIONADO
Senior Member
 
FISHIONADO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 698
Billy closed the deal after Tommy Gomes and John from Oceanside spoke for us. Marti Emerald mentioned that Coastkeeper tried to push something through that wasn't well documented but that she had printed materials with data from reputable sources from Billy. My representative Sherri Lightner said "ditto to that". I didn't get to speak but I was definitely OK with how Donna Frye managed the meeting.
FISHIONADO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 06:22 PM   #2
tylerdurden
Bad Clone
 
tylerdurden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 874
Just got off the phone with Billy V

__________________
MLPA, if you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem

Let the Fish and Game Commission know what you think about the proposed maps.

Be ready for December 9th and 10th.




tylerdurden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 10:57 AM   #3
Royak
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: La Jolla
Posts: 46
Facing Reality

The City Council committee will strongly support the enviros. Probably unanimously. Give it your best shot, but also try to modify Proposal #1 so it doesn't effect our Big Rock kayak launch area at Windansea Beach (near Palomar St.)

Moving the proposed reserve's northern border south to "Pink Wall" -- the cliff area just south of the launch area would maintain a hassle-free launch & return area for fishermen.

It would also make the northern border visible, natural and enforceable.

Next to LJ Shores, Windansea may be the safest beach launch in San Diego.

Proposal #1 is also in violation of the Windansea Plan, approved by the City. go to http://www.nerila.com:80/fow/index.html to see how fishing is supposed to be protected there.

Sorry to be negative (I still say we should "Sue the Bastards").
Royak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 11:08 AM   #4
JoeBeck
Senior Member
 
JoeBeck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: San Diego
Posts: 370
If the majority of people who show up "YOU" are not enviros and don't support this proposal the city council can not. Their job is to represent the majority opinion in their district. If they fail to do so you need to make sure your voices are heard loud and they know they will be losing future votes and public support.

That is why Everyone needs to show up at this meeting or we will be hearing from the Coastkeeper and San Diego at the upcoming MLPA meeting showing support to close the coast of SD.

They are not asking for support for the MLPA process, it is a little late for that, we who have attended meetings have shown support of the process by being involved in it. There are 3 maps left, coastkeepers are side stepping this and trying to gain support for maximized closures outside of the required MLPA's.

You who think you can not make a difference or put up a good fight will always lose in the worst way.
JoeBeck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 11:11 AM   #5
Holy Mackerel
Señor member
 
Holy Mackerel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,627
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeBeck View Post
If the majority of people who show up "YOU" are not enviros and don't support this proposal the city council can not. Their job is to represent the majority opinion in their district. If they fail to do so you need to make sure your voices are heard loud and they know they will be losing future votes and public support.

That is why Everyone needs to show up at this meeting or we will be hearing from the Coastkeeper and San Diego at the upcoming MLPA meeting showing support to close the coast of SD.

They are not asking for support for the MLPA process, it is a little late for that, we who have attended meetings have shown support of the process by being involved in it. There are 3 maps left, coastkeepers are side stepping this and trying to gain support for maximized closures outside of the required MLPA's.
Exactly!

YES ON MAP 2 today guys, stick with the game plan, urge the City Council to abopt their OWN proposal, and reject Coast Keepers proposal.

Every man, woman, and child (cough, cough Marine business owner) needs to be there today.
Holy Mackerel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 11:40 AM   #6
emrliquidlife
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 59
Guys I'm having a tough time figuring out how to make this work.

Is there a way I can get the video to one of you guys so that the safety side of the house can be addressed?

Via FTP or something. The vid is some 25 megs so email seems to be out.

Ed
emrliquidlife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 12:14 PM   #7
habanero
Senior Member
 
habanero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: SD
Posts: 133
I might be able to help with this Ed, so check your PM.



Quote:
Originally Posted by emrliquidlife View Post
Guys I'm having a tough time figuring out how to make this work.

Is there a way I can get the video to one of you guys so that the safety side of the house can be addressed?

Via FTP or something. The vid is some 25 megs so email seems to be out.

Ed
habanero is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 2002 Big Water's Edge. All rights reserved.