|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forum | Online Store | Information | LJ Webcam | Gallery | Register | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
07-08-2014, 11:06 AM
|
#1 |
|
lizard king
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Lakewood
Posts: 520
|
This means all those pier guys gonna rush out to buy kayaks and were gonna be packed out there!
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
07-08-2014, 11:15 AM
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Camarillo
Posts: 1,491
|
Just don't chum the water or the city will ban kayaking.
|
|
|
|
|
07-08-2014, 11:30 AM
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 123
|
I think they need the state's permission to do this though. At least to permanently remove the ability to fish there.
|
|
|
|
|
07-08-2014, 02:49 PM
|
#4 |
|
Junior
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 9
|
PETA was/is there to help, calling for a ban on all fishing, of course.
|
|
|
|
|
07-08-2014, 03:21 PM
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Menifee, CA
Posts: 1,474
|
Perhaps the swimmer is a PETA agent sent to swim off the pier for this very reason. It's all a conspiracy I tell you! A conspiracy!!!
__________________
So long and thanks for all the fish... |
|
|
|
|
07-08-2014, 04:17 PM
|
#6 |
|
Currently @ MLO Territory
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Under the Shadow
Posts: 2,290
|
What a Mess! I'm surprised this has not happened in La Jolla with all the fishery and constant swimmers there.
If you are swimming in the ocean, there is a risk. If you are swimming next to a fisherman there is a greater risk. If you are swimming next to a pier full of fisherman there is even a greater risk. I don't know what happened, but nobody knew that the shark was going to bite the swimmers. At the same time I don't know who is most at fault here, the swimmers or the fisherman fishing legally who caught a shark off the pier.
__________________
 Team: Disbanded You only have one chance in this life...make the right decision(s)...so you don't regret it
|
|
|
|
|
07-08-2014, 05:18 PM
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Tehachapi
Posts: 81
|
Reaction
Quote:
Reaction bite, reaction comments, reaction fishing ban. I had read a while back that GW's are mainly fish eaters until they reach around 10', then they switch to mammals (and human flesh). That was from memory and the internet, for what it's worth. I had heard the guy that got bit, on a talk radio show yesterday. He had no health insurance and wanted to know who was going to pay his medical bills. He said the fisherman were agitating the shark and caused the fish to bite him. Very angry at the people who where laughing on the U tube video. I haven't seen it. He takes no responsibility for putting himself in the Pacific Ocean, or swimming near a pier. I think this story will be around for while, and the truth may finally get out after all the sensational BS is played out. Next headline, "Man sues Fisherman, Manhattan Beach, DFW, State of California, and the Pacific Ocean. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
