Proposed CA Fishing Tackle Lead Ban

[ful-rac]

Well...there were lead weights on the tire that ran over and killed that raccoon that Mitchell skinned out....


http://www.bigwatersedge.com/bwevb/a...1&d=1517945524

[MITCHELL]

On my mountain bike I bought home a couple of pounds
I wonder how much a tungstun 8oz torpedo sinker cost.ill start making my own steel stinkers they might be a little bigger but when they rust they will look like kelp.

[MITCHELL]

Fur coat.

[goldenglory18]

All I'm saying is it's worth thinking about.

Either we start to think of another solution, or we get lambasted by those "environmentalists" as destroying the water and we are caught without another option.

We should be a lot more concerned about plastic baits than we should lead weights....

[PAL]

The American Sportfishing Association has also come out in opposition to the proposed lead tackle ban. Here's how the ASA addresses the impacts to wildlife in California.

Impacts on Wildlife The United States model for managing fish and wildlife is respected worldwide. The magnitude of research and management on the widest variety of species is unrivaled. A fundamental principle of our highly successful user-pay model that benefits more than just hunted and fished species, is that fish and wildlife management in the U.S. is based on the dynamics of populations. The most common wildlife species cited for interactions with lead fishing tackle is the common loon, which may be found in California as a transient resident during the winter. However, loon populations are stable or increasing throughout their range. This is not to say that the death of any animal from unnatural causes is something celebrate. Far from it. However, it is just as inappropriate to claim that lead tackle is leading to population dynamic shifts that create vulnerabilities in sensitive species.

Furthermore, we believe California specific studies have failed to identify direct impacts of lead fishing tackle on bird species or any other wildlife species within the state of California. While other states have conducted studies on the impacts of lead tackle on marine and other wildlife, California has not. Studies from other states are not directly applicable to California. In some cases, the sample sizes of often quoted studies (N=1) do not equate to sound scientific investigation.

If it passes, I will definitely miss the leadhead jigs I use for fishing swimbaits in saltwater. Not counting the hooks, many of them are under 2 cm in length, including the jigs I use in San Diego Bay and for calicos.

[stevie951]

I signed, and wrote Takano, and Calvert not sure what much it will do But here is also a post I just put up on my personal facebook, just my two cents on it all.. After all, we are the ones who are the first to inform the community on laws changing within our industry/hobby?

"Hey guys, a few fishing friends, and myself are concerned about recent legislation put forth. California will vote Apr. 2nd, 2018 and will likely pass laws stating anything under 50 grams, or just under 2 ounces of lead will be illegal to hold on your persons while fishing. At this time there is no scientific evidence listed in the bill text, rather it's simply deeming the material as an immediate hazardous waste. I ask that you just take a look at what's here and sign the petition that will be presented to the Legislators next week; it will give more time for education to be introduced to the process, and also will allow more time for Mom N' Pop tackle shops to obtain needed materials to support the fishing industry. Thanks for reading "