![]() |
|
Home | Forum | Online Store | Information | LJ Webcam | Gallery | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,928
|
Quote:
I just got back from fishing the Mole in Catalina. There I heard about others, and actually talk to two anglers that had to come to Catalina to pay fines. All due to fishing in MLPA area around Catalina. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
donkey roper
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pacific Beach
Posts: 968
|
Good. Keep them closed. MPAs are working. Anyone who disagrees probably hasn't fished next to one lately. I see 50 boats and yaks in the cove just crushing the YT, fishing frozen squid in the middle of the winter, taking more fish than they can eat, not even thinking about releasing a fish, and yet complaining about how their rights are being violated? Please. You don't even realize how good we have it. I say lower the YT limit to 3 per angler and keep the MPAs permanently.
I do agree there should be more of an effort to demonstrate the effectiveness of the MPAs, since it's tax dollars and license revenue which pay to enforce the laws. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 901
|
I am a tree hugger and I kill a lot of really Big fish.
I absolutely Love having MLPA's in La Jolla, PROTECTING that awesome biodiverse undersea world and fishery. Sometimes really Big Fish venture out from these protected areas ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Central Coast
Posts: 398
|
WOW, some responses amaze me.
But to respond to the original post. As I have said before WELCOME to the Club. We have been dealing with this BS for 10 years and the first review is just starting up so we shall see what happens. RH p.s. Chris138 not sure if your aware but the MLPA and the fish being caught have absolutely nothing to do with each other. Its CALLED EL NINO Water temps are still at a all time High for January even after all these storms. The Bonita I caught in Monterey County on New Years must have been caused by the MLPA as well. Those post are just what they love to see.
__________________
Team Central Coast Kayak Fishing ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
donkey roper
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pacific Beach
Posts: 968
|
Quote:
http://www.nwfsc.noaa.gov/news/featu...nino/index.cfm |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,384
|
Quote:
I would agree that MPAs can be a great thing in the right area, at the right time and instituted correctly. Unfortunately, this is not the case in the MLPA process in Ca. They did not even follow the basic guidlines set forth by the MPA Handbook. The biggest irony of the process was that they were saying there would be "spillover" outside to the MPAs while the design of the size of the MPAs was to prevent the resident fish from roaming outside. Some might argue that the eggs are the spillover, but that holds little water. The tiny critters that hatch from the eggs (if they survive that long) will be greeted by millions of hungry predators with little to nowhere to hide (the MPAs encompass most kelp and structure around them). |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SAN DIEGO
Posts: 1,086
|
Give the MLPA an inch and they will take a mile. The only reason we can fish in La Jolla now is due to the collective defense efforts of the fishing enthusiasts.
The MLPA is mostly empowered by deep pocket special interest groups. The MLPA are an extreme imbalanced Nazi group. If it was up to them, they would love to close off all of La Jolla and confiscate all our fishing gear. The MLPA is NOT closing fishing grounds just so you can catch more and bigger fish in the future. Their ultimate agenda is to completely commit genocide to the fishing industry. Last edited by driftwood; 01-25-2016 at 06:57 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
donkey roper
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pacific Beach
Posts: 968
|
Quote:
2010 was an epic squid bite year for many. Just not at any of the nests WCW participants were fishing I guess. My point is not that a specific MPA protects or doesn't protect a certain species or zone. Clearly that conversation should be dictated purely by science, of which there is little. The question is, do something or do nothing? Personally, after watching the kooks in la jolla my entire life, I would not trust the future of our fishery to their judgement. Certainly not to their scientific appraisal of the effectiveness of conservation measures. My point is this: why are the people with the most to gain from conservation, so adamantly against it? We kayak fishers could have a very real contribution to make towards preserving our natural resource. Whether its tagging fish, taking samples, collecting data, submitting heads, volunteering at Hubbs etc. Some of us do this, yet many firmly place themselves "across the table" (as the OP put it) from scientists and policy makers; basically ensuring that our concerns are completely ignored? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Palos Verdes
Posts: 1,885
|
Double Wow...
rhyak said..."WOW, some responses amaze me."
Me too...really makes me wonder what side of the table some of these kayakers would have been on during the stakeholder negotiations. ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
Jim / Saba Slayer ![]() Last edited by Saba Slayer; 01-24-2016 at 08:05 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
PROBATION
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 657
|
Quote:
blah blah blah...STFU shame on you for posting this chit donkey show. Your MPA loving ass should be banned. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|