![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 516
|
I've had a few pairs of Redington Waders. The current pair I have is about 4 years old. They are touch too, most of the time The sonic pros are great, but pricey. There are a few review from flyfishing outfits online, where they field and office test about ten of the top models, and rate each one based on different parameters,(moisture level, sweat, cut, flex, layers of fabric, etc. Don't get DWR product, (Durable water resistant) as most of them do not breath, and are not waterproof and break down fairly quickly. The above study also takes into account, the water permeability of the material. Most likely you will spend a few bills to get a quality product.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
donkey roper
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pacific Beach
Posts: 968
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 516
|
I've been looking at the "pant" waders as well, just a bit less to stow when out on the water. Below are a few sites that I've been looking at lately for waders.
http://lovigkayakfishing.com/gear/drypants http://www.twsport.cl/indumentaria-d...st-waders.html http://www.hatchmag.com/articles/rev...-pants/7711572 And here is the 2013 Yellowstone shootout for wader of the year: http://www.yellowstoneangler.com/gea...elas-bootfoots There is a lot of data in the above study. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
donkey roper
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pacific Beach
Posts: 968
|
Quote:
With the exception of the orvis silver sonics those seem well regarded. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: where the hell is Temecula
Posts: 268
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|