I Am Curious....

[SeaEagle_1]

i think we are all in agreement that the science behind the MLPA is flawed and skewed against us and in favor of the environmentalists'. and that it is this so called "science" that has led to our current situation. so i am curious about something; why don't we, as a group, pool our resources into having a 3rd party actually do the science and use that in the law suite to show that the science was indeed flawed? or at least to show that the science is in conflict with one another and to stall the implementation till a final OPEN study can be preformed by a company agreed to by both parties?

so what do you guys think? is this whole thing a joke and no report regardless of what it says will have any affect? or is it a great idea that could change the whole outcome? or something in between? i have no idea. but its a thought.