01-04-2012, 03:09 PM | #1 |
Administrator
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 1-2 miles off the point
Posts: 6,943
|
Down imaging ?
__________________
|
01-04-2012, 03:11 PM | #2 |
Administrator
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 1-2 miles off the point
Posts: 6,943
|
This is actually the same unit I am installing for a customer............apparently it does work, pretty sure Lowrance rep had told me otherwise for theirs.
http://www.stripersonline.com/t/7961...aging-in-a-yak
__________________
|
01-04-2012, 04:28 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Menifee
Posts: 2,509
|
Yep. Same thing I was told by a Lowrance Rep. Theirs have to be in the water.
__________________
”The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it.” ~Thomas Jefferson.........maybe |
01-04-2012, 04:36 PM | #4 |
.
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,155
|
i have a humminbird 597 ci hd di and i use the grease through hall method. it hasn't been mounted any other way so i dont have a comparison.
through hall with grease seems to work fine. not big fan of goop
__________________
|
01-04-2012, 04:47 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 270
|
what is difference?
i just received 898 hummingbird with side imaging from santa for Christmas . is that over kill for kayak ? or will it help in summertime when yellows are blowing up? stock transducer needs to be in water. right now it is mounted on mad frog. Do you do lessons on reading meter Iceman? thx for help . anthony.
|
01-04-2012, 04:56 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,384
|
Just the design of the Lowrance imaging Xducer would probably require something other than in hull mount. It looks like half a hot dog, split lengthwise, mounted on a flat plate. According to the Lowrance seminar at Fred Hall, Down Imaging has a limited use. It is not a cone angle like your sonar, it is a wide beam to the sides and very narrow front to back. It is very good for showing when you are exactly passing over structure, but will not tell you if you are approaching it.
|
01-04-2012, 05:20 PM | #7 | |
Administrator
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 1-2 miles off the point
Posts: 6,943
|
Quote:
Most of you guys have meters I can not afford.
__________________
|
|
01-04-2012, 05:29 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 736
|
Quote:
When they are "blowing up" what are you gonna do throw the sonar at them? |
|
01-04-2012, 05:43 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,384
|
Quote:
Side Imaging can be great for skirting the edge of kelplines and determining which direction the school of bait/fish are/went, among other things. It puts out a ton of sonar signal though. |
|
01-04-2012, 07:11 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Carlsbad
Posts: 591
|
__________________
|
01-04-2012, 07:33 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Baja fish camp
Posts: 478
|
Here is a link to a fellow who put a side scan/down imaging transducer inside his kayak.
Also has the follow up images to show that it does work. I hope this helps. http://www.akff.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=82&t=41626 |
01-05-2012, 12:08 AM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: oceanside
Posts: 880
|
Quote:
Good to know it will work, not that I could afford it. Thanks for posting that wally. |
|
01-05-2012, 12:41 AM | #13 |
Guerro Grande
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 629
|
Even though Lowrance says not to do it, I think that, if done properly, it will work. The key is to get enough adhesive/sound transmission material under it so there will be no gaps. You also need a kayak with a well-defined portion of the keel that is normally underwater. You'll lose side performance if mounted on a flat surface. I think the bow or stern would be the only real internal mounting options. I've seen external mounts using brackets to attach to the stern.
__________________
Douglas Gaxiola Team No Fish- Amateur Staff |
01-05-2012, 09:04 AM | #14 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North S.F. Valley
Posts: 51
|
Andy,
Al has the DI 597 mounted with grease. Loves it. Angel |
01-05-2012, 12:47 PM | #15 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: on the road...
Posts: 598
|
Quote:
***NOTE - all those screen shots where in 10-20' of water, on a lake...if you read the whole thing he mentions boat wakes and wind chop giving him significant interference....I would like to see some screenshots in 80-150' of water with light swell/chop *** Also his system is an hds, with the dsi/side scan upgrade....it still the has regular 50-200khz sonar too so it is much more versatile than the DSI only units....the "Elite series DSI's" are DSI ONLY and IMO are not that great for the ocean.....but the system shown in that thread...the standard HDS-5, with the side/dsi is super duper rad ( been on a skiff that has it )....and expensive (1200-1500+ for both units?)....definantly makes finding bait easier when its tough. |
|
01-05-2012, 03:06 PM | #16 |
.
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,155
|
here is my take on down imaging
my HB 597 CI HD DI is lower to middle end of the sonar pack . it has 455khz @16° and 200khz @25° for regular sonar and 455khz @75° and 800khz @45° in DI. yes you can use them at the same time with spit screen or split screen with the GPS. my sonar does not have side scan, wish it did. DI is for structure, yes it does show fish but not as well as regular sonar but the cool thing with DI is with all the bait in the water lately it shows bait as individual smaller fish marks with larger marks (not bait fish) so your not just looking at a cloud like i see in 200KHZ regular sonar when the bait fish are packed up. yes it starts loosing the bottom at 250ft in salt. DI kelp stringers look like kelp stringers, 80' to 120' you can see large bottom structure. is it worth it for inshore? probably not for most anglers familiar with what their looking at but for me it helps me with what im seeing in regular sonar. so for me, yes it's a cool toy. it has some features like zoom and being able to record, take snap shots and watch/view on the computer when you get back. ok i know your next questions, wheres the records you have taken? i have some of the bay but don't have any in LJ. well i did but erased them. if you are interested in seeing what the sonar recordings at LJ looks like? i will try and take some and post them up. heres a snaps shot and recording at SI
__________________
|
01-05-2012, 03:33 PM | #17 |
.
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,155
|
pretty boring, not a lot of structure in the bay. plus this is one of the first recordings. this is what it looked like out of the box. the verticle stripes you see in the beginning is sonar interferance from another yaks sonar
__________________
|
01-05-2012, 04:49 PM | #18 |
Ancient Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: On The Water
Posts: 935
|
DSI transducers can be mounted using Navico's scupper mount thing-a-ma-jig-dealys. Someone that is as good as Andy at repairing and modifiyng yaks could find a cool way to make a clean install using one of these... will anxiously await the masters pics of his DSI install!
|
|
|