Kayak Fishing Adventures on Big Water’s Edge  

Go Back   Kayak Fishing Adventures on Big Water’s Edge > Kayak Fishing Forum - Message Board > General Kayak Fishing Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-15-2015, 08:34 PM   #1
Murray
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Vista
Posts: 326
Lowrance Elite Chirp Fishfinders

Would like to hear how many of you are using this fish finder and how you have configured it. Seems like taking advantage of the chirp technology is the way to go. With that said, my 50/200 transducer offers high chirp, low chirp, high/low, and non chirp options. If anyone has on the water experience in comparing these various options, it would be great to hear your results. If there are enough users out there, we could probably save ourselves a lot of time by sharing info within this thread.
Murray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2015, 07:17 AM   #2
Raskal311
Senior Member
 
Raskal311's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Santa Ana/Westminster
Posts: 1,256
Interested in this info as well, my elite 7 chrip with 50/200 455/800 ducer should arrive any day.
__________________
Kevin
Yellow PA12
Raskal311 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2015, 07:58 AM   #3
Murray
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Vista
Posts: 326
cool. I have been doing my homework so let me know if you have any questions. My first hint is how to take it out of demo mode. Make sure you have the Yes box highlighted in Blue. I struggle with colors (somewhat color blind) so had to call tech support to discover I was actually pressing the No key. I also ended up having to update the firmware to ver 4 since I locked up the system. Lowrance tech support is very good and walked me thru the procedure and answered all of my questions so far. I will be using the Simulator mode today to experiment with the various settings. It simulates a real time environment allowing you to see what your changes do to the display. I got the elite chirp 5 so your 7 should probably make the fish jump into your lap. Ha!
Murray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2015, 08:09 AM   #4
spicolly
.....
 
spicolly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Carlsbad
Posts: 135
I bought the Elite-4X CHIRP with the 83/200 455/800 kHz transducer last year...before it came with GPS. Big miss by me as it was my first FF and I didn't realize how useful/valuable GPS was until I started fishing with people who have them.

Regarding the unit, I recently ran into intermittent power issues. Once it powers on, it hasn't lost power. I have played with it all week in my garage and have not been able to recreate the issue...it has powered on just fine without making any changes. However, a few times in the last month I've got out on the water and it wouldn't power up until an hour into my trip on the water. Very frustrating. Here's the post describing the issue with some possible help from the community: http://www.bigwatersedge.com/bwevb/s...ad.php?t=27785

From a functional unit, I like it a lot. I switch back and forth between a single and double panel view, depending on what I'm doing (ie., looking for bait, structure, unidentified stuff, etc). I like the downscan capabilities, and have actually seen my line go down and hang out with fish...which is kinda cool.

My opinion, if you want to stay on the lower pricing end, it's a good unit, esp since Lowrance has added GPS on the Elite-5.
spicolly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2015, 09:58 AM   #5
Raskal311
Senior Member
 
Raskal311's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Santa Ana/Westminster
Posts: 1,256
Have you guys felt the 83/200 455/800 transducer is sufficient in 200 foot of water?
__________________
Kevin
Yellow PA12
Raskal311 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2015, 10:34 AM   #6
spicolly
.....
 
spicolly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Carlsbad
Posts: 135
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raskal311 View Post
Have you guys felt the 83/200 455/800 transducer is sufficient in 200 foot of water?
I haven't gone off shore...mainly stayed inshore @LJ., NW corner, etc...maybe got to 140' - 160' over the summer and it worked fine for locating structure on the bottom. Recently fished inshore at Carlsbad off the power plant and didn't go deep at all. Also fished outside the harbor in O'Side...never got to 200'. So, for the fishing I have done, the 83/200 has been fine for helping me to find bait balls, structure, fish arches, etc. I haven't used a 50/200, so I unfortunately cannot compare it. I do clearly see lots of fish in the shallow MLPA when launching at LJ, which really hurts.
spicolly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2015, 12:52 PM   #7
hiramehunter
Senior Member
 
hiramehunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Near Palos Verdes
Posts: 198
is Chirp a good option for over 300'?
I usually fish from 200 - 340' range. Would chirp be a good option for that too?
hiramehunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2015, 01:20 PM   #8
Chuck D
Senior Member
 
Chuck D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bay Park
Posts: 559
50/200 is way better then the 83 for deepwater. Have had both and the 83 hardly works in deep water. It is made for better resolution in shallow water applications.
Chuck D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2015, 01:32 PM   #9
acorad
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Agoura Hills
Posts: 166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck D View Post
50/200 is way better then the 83 for deepwater. Have had both and the 83 hardly works in deep water. It is made for better resolution in shallow water applications.
Great info in this thread!

Chuck, how deep is "deepwater" you are talking about?

200? 400? 1000?

Andy
acorad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2015, 01:46 PM   #10
Chuck D
Senior Member
 
Chuck D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bay Park
Posts: 559
Quote:
Originally Posted by acorad View Post
Great info in this thread!

Chuck, how deep is "deepwater" you are talking about?

200? 400? 1000?

Andy
I would say deepwater for me is over 150ft. Anything this deep and more that 83 is almost worthless.
Chuck D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2015, 02:23 PM   #11
YakDout
Brandon
 
YakDout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,345
Ive had both 83 and 50. 83 had problems around 150. New hds unit with 50khz is what im running now. Ran over deep spots in la jolla canyon and got readings over 1000 feet. Youre going to lose detail at that depth now matter WHAT you have. But my 83 wouldnt even see the bottom in that kinda stuff.
YakDout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2015, 02:29 PM   #12
acorad
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Agoura Hills
Posts: 166
Thanks Chris & yakdout.

Last edited by acorad; 12-16-2015 at 03:42 PM.
acorad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2015, 02:35 PM   #13
momo fish
Senior Member
 
momo fish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Camarillo
Posts: 1,491
The man has spoken.. X2..

I ran both types in the water and anything in the mid to high 100's the 83 doesn't show you much bottom structure compared to the 50.. High chirp works great but at times I find using just 200 sufficient in shallow water...


Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck D View Post
50/200 is way better then the 83 for deepwater. Have had both and the 83 hardly works in deep water. It is made for better resolution in shallow water applications.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
momo fish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2015, 07:29 PM   #14
Raskal311
Senior Member
 
Raskal311's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Santa Ana/Westminster
Posts: 1,256
I spoke to lowrance several times before ordering and every rep said over 100 feet the 50 is a must but my buddys 83 seem to read ok at 175 feet. I'll do a side by side compare with his as soon as I can.
__________________
Kevin
Yellow PA12
Raskal311 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2015, 04:12 AM   #15
Murray
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Vista
Posts: 326
Believe Down Scan Imaging is good to go for depths under 300 ft. Is anyone using Down Scan Overlay? If so, can you share application and results? I do not fully understand this feature.
Murray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2015, 10:31 AM   #16
JohnMckroidJr
Senior Member
 
JohnMckroidJr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 1,945
Quote:
Originally Posted by hiramehunter View Post
is Chirp a good option for over 300'?
I usually fish from 200 - 340' range. Would chirp be a good option for that too?
That would depend on the frequency of the chirp sonar. Low frequency (50Khz) is better for deep water, and higher frequency (200khz) is better for shallower water. The best high end sonar boxes are all chirp today, it is a newer technology that uses multilple frequencies simultaneously to produce sharper detail than conventional sonar.
JohnMckroidJr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2015, 04:17 PM   #17
Fishin' Magician
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Newport Beach
Posts: 219
Quote:
Originally Posted by Murray View Post
Believe Down Scan Imaging is good to go for depths under 300 ft. Is anyone using Down Scan Overlay? If so, can you share application and results? I do not fully understand this feature.
I know that this is for a slightly different unit, but this is a video for a Lowrance Elite 4 HDI and in it they discuss how to use the Down Scan Overlay feature over your sonar. I found it to be pretty useful.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSH-XE4vVuY
__________________
Here fishy, fishy, fishy.....
Fishin' Magician is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2015, 05:17 PM   #18
Murray
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Vista
Posts: 326
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fishin' Magician View Post
I know that this is for a slightly different unit, but this is a video for a Lowrance Elite 4 HDI and in it they discuss how to use the Down Scan Overlay feature over your sonar. I found it to be pretty useful.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSH-XE4vVuY
very helpful video. wondering what colors to choose for us la jolla guys when using the downscan overlay feature. did not notice simulator depth but my simulator is very shallow compared to what we fish in la jolla. thanks again for the input.
Murray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2015, 07:23 PM   #19
Raskal311
Senior Member
 
Raskal311's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Santa Ana/Westminster
Posts: 1,256
Ohh crap


Lowrance transducers:

Compatible (Fits Lowrance Ready housing):
000-0106-72 HST-WSBL 83/200 Skimmer Blue Connector
000-10976-001 HDI Skimmer 83/200 + 455/800
000-10260-001 DSI Skimmer 455/800
000-0106-48 HST-WSU Uniplug 83/200 Skimmer

Incompatible (Too large for Lowrance Ready housing):
000-0106-77 HST-DFSBL 50/200 Skimmer
000-11302-001 Airmar TM150
000-11062-001 Airmar P66
000-10977-001 HDI Skimmer 50/200 + 455/800
000-10802-001 StructrureScan HD
__________________
Kevin
Yellow PA12
Raskal311 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2015, 08:06 PM   #20
surfisher
Senior Member
 
surfisher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Carlsbad
Posts: 388
I currently use the Elite 7 Chirp on my boat, 50/200 and 455/800. The Downscan will read all the way to 300'. I have marked schools of yellows on it to that deep, but using chirp or 200khz is my preference. Takes a trip or two to dial in (like any fishfinder), and will take a little getting used to reading the downscan, but what I can say is it makes finding bait 100x easier, and you can distinguish game fish way easier. They will show up as a bright dot (thicker dot for bigger fish) instead of your normal boomerang like the high chirp will show. When you meter a bait school, there will be a hundred tiny little dots. Super nice to use!!!
__________________

Last edited by surfisher; 12-17-2015 at 08:12 PM.
surfisher is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 2002 Big Water's Edge. All rights reserved.