|
Home | Forum | Online Store | Information | LJ Webcam | Gallery | Register | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
12-13-2017, 11:58 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Palos Verdes
Posts: 1,857
|
good fishing news...
Landmark Legislation to Benefit Saltwater Anglers Advances in U.S. House
House Natural Resources Committee Approves Magnuson-Stevens Reauthorization Bill Washington, D.C. – December 13, 2017 –Today the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Natural Resources approved H.R. 200, a bill sponsored by Congressman Don Young (R-Alaska) that amends the 1976 Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act to provide flexibility for fishery managers and stability for fishermen. A coalition of organizations representing the saltwater recreational fishing and boating community endorsed H.R. 200 and highlighted the importance of incorporating saltwater recreational fishing management provisions into the nation’s primary law governing federal fisheries management. On April 6, 2017, Congressman Garret Graves (R-La.), a leader on recreational fishing issues, introduced H.R. 2023, the Modern Fish Act, to address the challenges facing recreational fishermen in the federal fisheries management system. He was joined by a bipartisan list of 24 cosponsors. Original cosponsors include Congressmen Gene Green (D-Texas), Daniel Webster (R-Fla.) and Rob Wittman (R-Va.). The Modern Fish Act’s legislative language was ultimately included in H.R. 200. “We owe great thanks to Chairman Rob Bishop, Congressman Don Young and Congressman Garret Graves for working together to bring meaningful change to recreational fisheries management through the reauthorization of the nation’s marine fisheries law,” said Jeff Angers, president of the Center for Sportfishing Policy. “This is a major step forward in implementing the vision set forth by the Morris-Deal Report for the future of saltwater recreational fishing. The importance of this legislation to the recreational fishing and boating community was made clear by tens of thousands of advocates who have made their voices heard by contacting their elected officials in recent months.” Through years of hard work, the priorities of the recreational fishing and boating community were identified and presented to federal policy makers by the Commission on Saltwater Recreational Fisheries Management. This group is also referred to as the Morris-Deal Commission, named for co-chairs Johnny Morris, founder and CEO of Bass Pro Shops, and Scott Deal, president of Maverick Boat Group. In 2014, the Morris-Deal Commission released “A Vision for Managing America’s Saltwater Recreational Fisheries,” which included six key policy changes to produce the full range of saltwater recreational fishing’s social, economic and conservation benefits to the nation.HEARING_FLOOR Many of the recommendations of the Morris-Deal Commission are addressed by the Modern Fish Act and now included in H.R. 200. This legislation addresses many of the challenges faced by recreational anglers, including allowing alternative management tools for recreational fishing, reexamining fisheries allocations and improving recreational data collection. The bill aims to benefit fishing access and conservation by incorporating modern management approaches, science and technology to guide decision-making. On December 8, the coalition requested in a letter to the U.S. House Committee on Natural Resources that the Modern Fish Act be included in the reauthorization of the Magnuson-Stevens Act and moved to the House floor for final passage. Furthermore, 135 marine recreational fishing and boating industry executives signed a letter to the U.S. House Committee on Natural Resources on December 11, in support of the Modern Fish Act and its inclusion in the final reauthorization of the Magnuson-Stevens Act. The saltwater fishing economy spans the entire United States not just the U.S. coastline, as demonstrated by the list of signatories. “America’s 11 million saltwater anglers have a $63 billion economic impact annually and generate 440,000 jobs,” said Mike Nussman, president and CEO of the American Sportfishing Association. “However, recreational fishing has been treated as an afterthought in the federal fisheries management system for decades. If enacted, H.R. 200 would finally give saltwater recreational fishing the attention it deserves in the Magnuson-Stevens Act.” “The need to revise the one-size-fits-all approach of the Magnuson-Stevens Act has been abundantly clear in recent years as anglers face unreasonably limited access to public marine resources,” said Thom Dammrich, president of the National Marine Manufacturers Association. “Stakeholders of the recreational boating industry, a uniquely American-made industry with an economic footprint of more than $121 billion annually and more than 650,000 American jobs, are encouraged by the Committee’s action today, and we hope to see final passage by the House very soon.” “We commend the U.S. House Committee on Natural Resources for taking the next step in reauthorizing the Magnuson-Stevens Act,” said Patrick Murray, president of Coastal Conservation Association. “The need to update our nation’s fisheries management system to ensure the conservation of our public marine resources and reasonable public access to those resources is abundantly clear. We look forward to the full House consideration of the bill.” “The provisions of the Modern Fish Act included in H.R. 200 would provide parity for federally-managed recreational fisheries, while continuing to safeguard the conservation of our fisheries resources,” said Jeff Crane, president of the Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation. “In addition to Chairman Bishop, Congressman Young and Congressman Graves, a big thanks to the bipartisan House leadership of the Congressional Sportsmen’s Caucus for their co-sponsorship of these important measures on behalf of America’s anglers.” “We thank Chairman Rob Bishop for expediting this Committee markup and moving the Magnuson-Stevens Act reauthorization bill forward,” said Jim Donofrio, president of the Recreational Fishing Alliance. “We also commend Congressman Don Young and Congressman Garret Graves for drafting this landmark legislation that will increase angler access while continuing to rebuild recreational fisheries.” “Recreational fishing and commercial fishing are two fundamentally different activities needing distinctly different management tools,” said Angers. “Since 1976, recreational anglers have been shoehorned into a management regime that was never designed to manage recreational fishing. H.R. 200 would make critical changes to the Magnuson-Stevens Act to better manage recreational fisheries.” Following today’s vote, the coalition encourages House leadership to quickly bring H.R. 200 to the floor for final passage. Marine recreational anglers and boaters are eager to see this landmark legislation move through the House and Senate and signed into law.
__________________
Jim / Saba Slayer |
12-13-2017, 01:02 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 420
|
Might not be actually good news. Last I read on this, and it was a few months ago, the flexibility they're touting now meant delaying action on protecting declining stocks so large commercial fisheries could continue unchecked until things reached critical mass. It's important for people to realize that reducing quotas early on when there are still plenty of fish to reproduce is much preferable to fishing them to the brink and having to close the fishery for 10 years.
|
12-13-2017, 04:21 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Seattle Area
Posts: 861
|
Layman's terms?
|
12-13-2017, 05:39 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Palos Verdes
Posts: 1,857
|
Good Thing...
IMHO it's a good thing especially when...
A coalition of organizations representing the saltwater recreational fishing and boating community endorsed H.R. 200 and highlighted the importance of incorporating saltwater recreational fishing management provisions into the nation’s primary law governing federal fisheries management. If these anglers are supporting H.R. 200, then I'm behind it 100%...Jeff Angers, president of the Center for Sportfishing Policy...Mike Nussman, president and CEO of the American Sportfishing Association...Thom Dammrich, president of the National Marine Manufacturers Association...Patrick Murray, president of Coastal Conservation Association...Jeff Crane, president of the Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation...and...Jim Donofrio, president of the Recreational Fishing Alliance. The bill aims to benefit fishing access and conservation by incorporating modern management approaches, science and technology to guide decision-making. THIS IS THE PRIMARY POINT IN MY OPINION... “America’s 11 million saltwater anglers have a $63 billion economic impact annually and generate 440,000 jobs, However, recreational fishing has been treated as an afterthought in the federal fisheries management system for decades. IF ENACTED, H.R. 200 WOULD FINALLY GIVE SALTWATER RECREATIONAL FISHING THE ATTENTION IT DESERVES IN THE MAGNUSON-STEVENS ACT.”
__________________
Jim / Saba Slayer |
12-13-2017, 08:40 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,897
|
|
12-14-2017, 06:57 AM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Seattle Area
Posts: 861
|
Quote:
|
|
12-14-2017, 04:13 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Ventura, Ca
Posts: 111
|
See this is kinda my problem with Politics today. Democrat and Republican.
That is literally 18 full paragraphs of "explaining" how great this bill is and why it should be supported, with literally zero explanation of what's actually in the bill, what kinds of actual changes will be made, and what science is behind it. Its great that its supported by different coalitions, but if I want to get any answers or try and make up my own mind, I have to try and read through dozens if not hundreds of pages of "political" or "legal" jargon in a bill or amendment and I'm left with more questions than answers. All I got was "theyre gonna start treating the recreational fisherman different from commercial fisherman" ok that sounds great on the surface but it doesn't explain what they actually plan to do. It could end up being horrific for the recreation angler and allow the commercial guys to destroy this precious resource more than they already are. Its like saying "The Patriot Act" sounds really patriotic, lets go ahead and support that before we read it. |
|
|