Kayak Fishing Adventures on Big Water’s Edge  

Go Back   Kayak Fishing Adventures on Big Water’s Edge > Kayak Fishing Forum - Message Board > General Kayak Fishing Discussion
Home Forum Online Store Information LJ Webcam Gallery Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-22-2011, 10:20 AM   #1
PAL
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 754
MLPA: Lawsuit filed up north!

Lawsuit filed in Mendocino County.

Quote:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Fort Bragg, California, Jan. 19, 2011

REPORTER SUES STATE AGENCIES

A journalist forcibly arrested for recording and speaking at a public meeting
is suing the privately funded MLPAI, and state agencies.

On April 20, 2010 David Gurney went to a Marine Life Protection Act Initiative meeting in Fort Bragg, California, to record the "public/private" agency that was closing off large areas of state waters to fishermen and seaweed gatherers. Soon after the meeting began, it was announced that the public would not be allowed to record or speak at the meeting.

"I was surprised," Gurney says, "The managers had decided to split up the thirty-four local stakeholders into separate sub-groups, against their will. They apparently didn't want it on tape."

But he had been working on a documentary of the MLPAI process for the past nine months, and the camera was rolling.

Executive Director Ken Wiseman immediately stopped the meeting.

"He and professional facilitator Eric Poncelet came up to me with an armed fish and game warden, and ordered me to quit filming," Gurney says. "I was threatened with ejection and arrest if I didn't."

He complied, but three other times during the two-day meetings, he continued to record. "I wanted to get some quick B-roll footage, to show how the stakeholders had been split up against their own vote," he says. Each time seen, he was ordered to stop.

Gurney also spoke up at the beginning of the proceedings when it was announced there would be no opportunity for public comment. "I knew that was also a violation of the law, to hold a public meeting and not allow any comment," he says. "I simply told the MLPAI that I had not given up my rights by attending their meeting."

Finally, near the end of the second day, Gurney asked a question that the staff did not want to hear.

"During the question and answer period, I asked whether the MLPAI would make any provisions to protect the ocean from other activities besides fishing. Things like oil drilling, wind and wave energy development, fish farms, etc. As the facilitator was telling me that no questions would be taken from the public, someone sent a Fish and Game Warden over to arrest me," Gurney says.

He was quickly escorted out of the meeting hall, handcuffed, and taken away in a Fish and Game pick-up truck.

In 2004, the MLPA “Initiative” resurrected a ten-year old law with undisclosed private funding, to create it’s own, nebulous state-like agency. Director Wiseman at first said that California laws, including the Bagley-Keene Open Meetings Act, did not apply because the process was “advisory” to state government. And yet the state supplied scientists, advisors and armed Fish and Game Wardens to act as security guards for public MLPAI meetings. Many feel that the blurring of lines between private and public interests opened the floodgates for corruption, and that illegal private influence of the democratic process runs rampant in the MLPAI.

California’s open meeting laws guarantee that citizens and members of the press have a right to keep track of what goes on in a public process, and assures they will not be harassed at public meetings. Yet the Marine Life Protection Act Initiative, funded by the secretive Resources Legacy Fund Foundation, often had secret, unrecorded meetings, changed the rules of their process at whim, and abided only by the laws of their own choosing.

Mr. Gurney had earlier volunteered to serve on his community's citizen watch-dog committee to keep an eye on the "Initiative." Many in his town felt that the privately funded commission had repeatedly crossed the line of illegality. In addition to violating state open meeting laws, a 72-foot blue whale had been killed off Fort Bragg by an unlicensed mapping vessel, contracted by the MLPAI. Native American interests were negligently ignored. Shady stipends, favors and promises were handed out from the unregulated contributions of the Resources Legacy Foundation. Secret, unrecorded meetings continued to be held. Local folks complained loudly of ineptitude, conflict of interest and corruption.

"I just wanted to get what I could on tape, for the historical record," he said.

He is seeking a permanent injunction that will prevent further violations of Bagley-Keene, Constitutional and other laws by the MLPAI, as well as damages suffered in the arrest.

Interestingly, the California Attorney General's Office has illegally declined routine service of papers in the complaint, forcing attorneys to initiate default proceedings against the state.
PAL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 10:29 AM   #2
peguinpower
bing!
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: socal
Posts: 246
Um, wow. I knew the process was defective, but the level of corruption and rights violation is still shocking me.
peguinpower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 11:44 AM   #3
fknricter
Senior Member
 
fknricter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: redlands, ca
Posts: 118
didnt this same thing happen down here too?? maybe this will open people's eyes to how crooked this process has been!
fknricter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 12:06 PM   #4
T-Rex
Senior Member
 
T-Rex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Rancho Santa Margarita
Posts: 770
The ongoing corruption connected with the MLPAI is unbelievable. Kamala Harris was sworn in as the new AG on Jan 10 and promised that the would ensure that "state law was on the side of the people."

Since the AG's office declined routine service of papers in the complaint, I guess the "people" she was referring to are these who work for government agencies.
T-Rex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 02:13 PM   #5
dsafety
Olivenhain Bob
 
dsafety's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Olivenhain, CA
Posts: 1,121
This line from PAL's post caught my eye.

"Interestingly, the California Attorney General's Office has illegally declined routine service of papers in the complaint, forcing attorneys to initiate default proceedings against the state."

I am not clear on the time frame of this statement but if I recall correctly, our current Governor was the AG for the past few years. If his office was unwilling to serve papers in this case, does that tell us something about what we can expect from the new administration on this issue?

Bob

Last edited by dsafety; 01-22-2011 at 03:56 PM.
dsafety is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 03:37 PM   #6
Lets_Fish
Senior Member
 
Lets_Fish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Wildomar, CA.
Posts: 294
Don't know about all of you but I smell something and it's not FISH!
Lets_Fish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 04:05 PM   #7
Jimmyz123
Senior Member
 
Jimmyz123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,385
So are you saying that it sounds like we again may get screwed?
Jimmyz123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 2002 Big Water's Edge. All rights reserved.