Kayak Fishing Adventures on Big Water’s Edge - View Single Post

zenspearo · 06-03-2009, 01:19 PM

But I disagree, and some of the smartest guys on the fishing sides disagree, that External C can be ignored.

We need to apply maximum pressure to eliminate C, because it is a drag on consumptives.

If it is evaluated in Round 2, it will get huge science scores (bigger and ridiculous closures = higher scores. No brainer there) and look like the fair hair child of all the proposals, and that put HUGE pressure on the consumptive RSGs to give up more to keep up. Even though External C is unrealistic, it is a foot at the neck of our RSG reps.

WE NEED TO RELIEVE THAT PRESSURE OR OUR RSG REPS WILL BE FORCED TO GIVE UP MORE AND MORE.

That's our job.

06-03-2009, 01:19 PM	#7
zenspearo Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 167	But I disagree, and some of the smartest guys on the fishing sides disagree, that External C can be ignored. We need to apply maximum pressure to eliminate C, because it is a drag on consumptives. If it is evaluated in Round 2, it will get huge science scores (bigger and ridiculous closures = higher scores. No brainer there) and look like the fair hair child of all the proposals, and that put HUGE pressure on the consumptive RSGs to give up more to keep up. Even though External C is unrealistic, it is a foot at the neck of our RSG reps. WE NEED TO RELIEVE THAT PRESSURE OR OUR RSG REPS WILL BE FORCED TO GIVE UP MORE AND MORE. That's our job. __________________ A spearo, but we are in this MLPA mess together