View Single Post
Old 12-16-2015, 09:34 AM   #6
spicolly
.....
 
spicolly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Carlsbad
Posts: 135
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raskal311 View Post
Have you guys felt the 83/200 455/800 transducer is sufficient in 200 foot of water?
I haven't gone off shore...mainly stayed inshore @LJ., NW corner, etc...maybe got to 140' - 160' over the summer and it worked fine for locating structure on the bottom. Recently fished inshore at Carlsbad off the power plant and didn't go deep at all. Also fished outside the harbor in O'Side...never got to 200'. So, for the fishing I have done, the 83/200 has been fine for helping me to find bait balls, structure, fish arches, etc. I haven't used a 50/200, so I unfortunately cannot compare it. I do clearly see lots of fish in the shallow MLPA when launching at LJ, which really hurts.
spicolly is offline   Reply With Quote