Thread: 881 lb Tuna!
View Single Post
Old 11-23-2011, 09:50 AM   #9
addicted2sp33d
Here fishy fishy fishy...
 
addicted2sp33d's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 774
Quote:
Originally Posted by jorluivil View Post
Yes, there is a difference. If I'm fishing for halibut and I 'foul hook' it its a legal catch. Why? Because it was my target species

If I'm hooping for bugs and I get a 15" sculpinin in my net its 'bycatch' and its illegal to keep.

There is a difference between a foul hook and bycatch, this tuna was bycatch.
I'm not trying to be confrontational here, but I don't think your "Target Species" exemption claim is legal. According to DFG, you're not allowed to keep any fish that does not voluntarily take the bait into its mouth (including foul hooks), regardless of it being your target species or not. I've heard this from Rangers, Conservationists, Game Wardens, you name it. The only exemptions are spearos and maybe some other guys.

Here's the Saltwater Regulations, Chapter 1, Section 1.05: http://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.as...28&inline=true
Excerpt:
1.05. ANgLiNg. To take fish by hook and line with the line held in the hand, or with the line attached to a pole or rod held in the hand or closely attended in such manner that the fish voluntarily takes the bait or lure in its mouth.

Here's the Freshwater Regulations:
http://dfg.ca.gov/regulations/FreshF...-ch2-art1.html

If you plan to keep a foul hooked barn door, PapaDCh has the right idea. Alternatively, you can call it-in, be completely forthright, and have it confiscated when you hit the beach. As some have mentioned above, this is Letter vs. Spirit... and knowingly or not, your "Target Species" foul hook exemption actually leans toward the Spirit side of enforcement.
addicted2sp33d is offline   Reply With Quote