![]() |
Do what feels right at the moment. The frozen coffers were running low and Sake steamed yellowtail with Asian chimichurri sauce and hamachi seaweed salad just seemed like the right call. :arne1:
http://www.bigwatersedge.com/bwegall.../500/After.jpg |
Hi Bob, let me help you with some facts related to commercial fishing for Rockfish and Black Seabass ...... BOTH have been massively commercially harvested in the past.
Black Seabass: The fish was so heavily exploited in both California and Mexican waters that the commercial landings declined rapidly from 115 tonnes in 1932 to 5 tonnes in 1980 in California waters, whereas it decreased greatly from 363 tonnes to 12 tonnes in Mexican waters over the same period (Domeier 2001). http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/20795/0 Rockfish: During the 1980s rockfish landings averaged 45,800 metric tons per year; peak rockfish catch occurred in 1982 when over 61,000 metric tons were landed along the US West Coast (PacFIN 2005). See page 9 at http://www.montereybayaquarium.org/c...fishReport.pdf I won't even state my opinion on c&r here, but I could not let a false statement like that pass without comment. |
Thanks for the correction Larry. I was unaware that either of those types of fish were ever commercially fished to any degree in the coastal San Diego waters. I wonder if those fish counts came from the gill netters and long line fishers that used to ply these waters.
I have lived near the ocean all my life. This must have snuck past me somehow. Bob |
I released this monster two days ago...
|
One of the nicest photographs I've ever seen.
|
Quote:
|
Release Women, Not Fish
|
LOL Sunday Bloody Sunday... :)
Yani, we are turning down your nomination for a sportfisherman of the year. What happened there, an accident?-Did that shark ran into your yak 30 mph or something'??? :D Josh, did yer photo biatch got the one when I was flapping with the wings? :D. Nice fish.:cheers1: |
Bob, you need to read up on California's checkered history with bottom-
trawling and gill netting, sounds like you may be familiar with the latter. One commercial boat caught close to 2000 lb. of WSB in ONE NIGHT last year in our local waters, on hook and line, at the kelpline. And gill nets (outside of 3 miles) still account for more than 50,000 lbs of white seabass each year in California - that's three more than Josh! <KNEE slap> So, basically the numbers are staggering and I'm whole-heartedly agreeing with all of dos ballenas, dorado50 and cioppino's great points on page one. And in case you released all your fish .... I recommend using the green, yellow, red seafood scale when considering buying seafood. http://www.montereybayaquarium.org/c...CoastGuide.pdf |
Quote:
Based on the majority of the responses to this thread, it appears that my position on C & R is not the prevailing one among our little group. That surprises me, but so be it. Just having this discussion is useful because it makes each of us take a closer look at the issue. There are plenty of valid arguments on all sides and a healthy discussion like this one gives everyone the opportunity see the big picture. Your latest post startled me a bit. I had no idea that the gill netters were still allowed to operate as close as three miles from our shores. That is well within kayak fishing range. Even more startling was your statistic regarding the size of their WSB take. If someone who cares about this stuff as much as I do is unaware of this fact, we can be fairly certain that the majority of the MLPA backers, let alone the general public have no idea that this is happening. 250,000 lbs of WSB? That is 5000, fifty pound fish. Wow! Your comment about the commercial boat catching 2000 lbs of WSB in one night also hit me. Was that a cattle boat or some other kind of commercial boat? If those fish were caught on a commercial fishing boat, (not a cattle boat), how did they get by the three fish per person limit, (one fish during the summer)? Cattle boat issues could be a whole new discussion. This is a free country and commercial sportfishing is a legitimate activity that has been with us forever. Most of us have enjoyed a few trips on those kinds of boats over the years. The problem is that a successful trip on most of those boats is measured by the number of fish caught. Big fish, little fish, bi-catch, it all goes into the sack. I doubt that much C & R is practiced on the party boats. Worse, that tourist from Iowa who filled his gunny sack with 50 pounds of whatever he could catch, probably did not eat any of those fish. After a photo session, his trophies probably ended up in the trash. This is perfectly legal but, in my view, very wrong. On the other hand, plenty of responsible fishers, just like you and I, fish from the party boats because it is their only way to enjoy this sport. They do not have access to a private boat or kayak. Lets assume for a moment that the 2000 pounds of WSB caught on the night you mentioned were landed by 25 different people all fishing from a party boat during the time of year when the WSB limit is three fish per person. Everyone had a valid fishing license and paid good money to go on this trip. On this particular night, everyone got lucky and limited out. While some of us may not like it, this would be perfectly legal. A trip like this would make the front page of the sport section in the paper and be featured prominently in the Convention and Visitor's Bureau's sales literature. A similar take could be made by 25 yakfishers during the next squid bite. Would it be unreasonable for all of these folks on that imaginary party boat to take their legal limit of our treasured WSB? Maybe. What if the harvest was made by a bunch of yakfishers? Comments in this thread have hashed out both sides of that question. This is a tough issue. Bob |
Josh that is definitely excessive, 40 pounds of ice would suffice! :D
Quote:
|
Quote:
frozen water protection act would prevent such waste Doctor Yani did the patient survive?:eek: love to see that pic in the middle of Tylers next slide show (real fast .5 second subliminal message) |
Quote:
"Although there is no limit at this time on the number of Humboldt squid that can be caught, anglers should be conservation-minded and take only what they can comfortably use. Landing reports indicate that large numbers of squid are not only being caught, but also being kept. The DFG is also receiving disturbing reports of a number of fishermen actually then dumping these dead squid when returning to the docks. Not only is this unethical but it also constitutes violations of wanton waste which is willfully wasting the state's fish resources (CCR Title 14 Section 1.87.)" http://www.dfg.ca.gov/QandA/2009/20090205.asp |
(One correction to my last post - approx 250,000 lbs of WSB is the total commercial take of
seabass annually with approx 50,000 of that taken using gillnets) May I suggest that you read the following WSB Report Card, end to end. There are many mind boggling statistics in the charts, and, I promise that you will learn a lot about the fish itself. Page 6 shows in 1959, 3.5 million pounds of WSB was taken commercially in California!!! Thats like 140,000 25 pound fish!! http://www.montereybayaquarium.org/c...bassReport.pdf The boat I mentioned was a regular ol' commercial boat, one of 140 that target white seabass in CA, not a CPFV (sportboat). A sportboat is not licensed to catch commercially that's "sport take" not "commercial take", and in CA, cannot be sold commercially. In other states besides CA, things are different. For many different reasons, the commercial guys are extremely silent about what they catch. They catch it, and it goes to market, and they make money. The less people that know how or when they caught fish, the better for them. Go to the fish market, look at the fish - ever wonder where those big WSB, and halibut come from? BTW, Recreational catches are staggering too. Take a look at the table in on the bottom of this page where it says "Annual Landing Totals" in black ... http://www.sportfishingreport.com/pa...?landing_id=20 From their own counts, in 2009, this landing alone sacked: -- 41,000 calico bass -- 37,000 rockfish and -- 12,000 yellowtail. One landing. I'm not out to pick on commercials, sporties or anyone, just thought I may help you understand where many others on this board are coming from, as I thought I saw the "disconnect". Your comments welcome. |
Quote:
These guys are otw for a living. And its not a some kind of secret. The ocean is a big and very dynamic ecosystem. Anyways, back on the cnr subject... fwi, most thresher sharks which are tail hooked and played to exhaustion do NOT recover from the battle after being released. Different species have different survivorship rates... fact, not all fish that are released are going to survive. Even fish that swim away apparently okay die sometimes. Once again, there are many reasons why released fish may or may not survive. And... fish that are of legal size have usually spawned once or twice. Size limits are set to insure that each fish is given a chance to reproduce. I don't think you should feel bad for harvesting a big legal fish ever. Quote:
For some people it takes a lot of yellowtail to realize that it don't freeze all that good! Have fun! :cheers1: |
Larry,
Thanks again for the contining education. One question though. Where do the recreational fish cactch numbers come from. Except for once last summer when some kid with a DFG shirt on asked me a bunch of questions about where I was fishing and what I caught, I have never been asked or reported a catch. Assuming that I am not alone, I am curious as to where the numbers come from. Does someone just pull a number from a hat? Bob |
Bob, Regarding recreational fish-catch counts, people that fish sportboats
are never asked because the boat and/or landing is required to provide fish counts. Kayakers are more difficult to find, and most private boaters are used to seeing the surveys at the launch/landing area (I believe). And sorry, I forgot to answer your other question above regarding the commercial guys and limits. Commercial fishermen are not regulated by DFG "sport" limits, if any at all. See http://www.dfg.ca.gov/marine/fishing.asp#Commercial for more info. Larry |
Quote:
Bob |
1 Attachment(s)
Attachment 1968
Heres a good example of catch and release Bob. Unfortunately they all rushed the scuppers at the same time and failed to make it back in the water! I love Cedros Island. Our fisheries health starts and ends with commercial fishing. You can catch and release all you want if thats what makes YOU happy. As long as everyone follows the regs then any problem you have with it is just that, your problem. I have made this comparison before but I will revisit it. Take a City lake for this analogy. Large mouth bass are not stocked. There is a reasonable take and size limit. They are targeted YEAR long almost everyday. Some fishermen take their limit every time, while others practice catch n release. Large mouth bass are not in danger of being over fished in these lakes. Anglers arent descimating LMB populations to the point of collapse. LMB are growing huge and their overall stocks are doing just fine. I talk about fresh water bass fishing because it is a prime example of a controlled environment not subject to commercial fishing. It is a healthy and sustainable fishery without MLPAs and without seasonal closures. Now lets take that same City lake and set me and my commercial gillnet boat loose in that same lake. In a matter of days you would have a fishery on the verge of collapse, one in diar need of serious regulating. What was once a ballanced and viable fishery for decades would be toast! My final babbling point, Bob due what makes you happy. Just dont hassle someone who isnt breaking the law and is well within the state regs by taking three fish in a week. Dont fool yourself by believing releasing fish is going to bring back any fishery when those same fish get their buts kicked by commercial fishermen. Get out there and catch some fish, you will feel a lot better. |
Cioppino,
You and I will continue to disagree on this subject but I respect your opinion and your right to have it. You and others have made some very valid points about the harmful affect that can come as a result of irresponsible commercial fishing activities. On that subject we are in total agreement. I am hopeful that by starting this discussion I was not perceived to be "hassling" anyone in particular. That certainly was not my intent. Bob |
Quote:
They freeze well if you freeze them whole. For both tuna and Yellowtail I just cut the tails and heads off, gut them then roll them in butcher paper and freeze them whole with the skin on like the Japanese do. http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2006/..._470x311,0.jpg My freezer looks like a stack of logs. When I want to eat one I pull it out cross cut the amount I want to eat that week off with my band saw, and throw the rest back in the freezer. When it thaws, you cut the skin and exposed ends off its' sashimi quality, and you have a couple of days to eat it before it starts going bad. Most sushi you eat at restaurants including Hamachi has been frozen, it's all in how you freeze it. Jim |
I like this post, good points on each side without the "d-nossle" comments (i guess i like those too, but we have BD for that).
I will continue to look forward to the day that I get to release my next YT or WSB.....not because I think it will help the fishery, but for the same selfish reasons most of us fish....its an awsome experiece!! (and because if I'm releasing delisious YT or WSB, either the freezer's full or the bite is WFO and I'm weeding thru the schoolers lookin for my next PB!!). FREEZING FISH: I'm pretty sure they (commercial ships) flash freeze the fish to a super low temperature to minimize the amount of sublimation (freezer burn or de-hydration) that occurs, after that the fish are stored and transported in a "normal" freezer where they very slowly warm back up to just below freezing, which could take weeks. As long as the fish in the freezer are colder than the freezer itself sublimation, generally will not occur. Basically the opposite of freeze-drying. So from a scientific stand point I think that vacuum sealing/freezing is still the best way for us, but after reading Jims post I think vacuum sealing/freezing the whole fish would be even better, or more practical, in big chunks with the skin on. |
I hear a nice flattie was released this morning. :doh:
|
Quote:
The advantage of the dry ice is that it freezes the fish much more rapidly than a regular home freezer. Evidently, rapid freezing results in smaller ice crystals, which do less damage to cell walls. This will give you a much better texture when thawed. I have done this a few times with YT and halibut and it seems to work very well. Freezing will also kill those nasty parasites, so you can use the fish for sashimi after thawing (even salmon and halibut). BTW:This is also an excellent way to freeze delicate fruits like strawberry, blackberry and raspberry. |
I think exercising moderation is a good thing. If you want to catch and release, cool. If you want to keep fish, thats good too. Try and not to keep too much.
Sharing your opinion in the hope that it may be considered, freedom of speech is with you on that one. I don't agree on forcing other people to follow someone elses "morals". Tolerance is a good thing. Tolerance for other people's decisions and choices as well as how much fish they should keep. This discussion has been civil. Ideas exchanged. :cheers1: |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:49 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 2002 Big Water's Edge. All rights reserved.